User talk:John Stephen Dwyer

"So ironic it's not. So un-ironic, it is."

DYK for Boston Hotel Buckminster

On August 9, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Boston Hotel Buckminster, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Austroplatypus incompertus

On 3 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Austroplatypus incompertus, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady (talk) 12:02, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

I was reading and article which included one of your photos, it was touching that someone took the time to photograph the individual in their older age. MrWikiGay (talk) 02:58, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No doubt you're talking about Jose. It was my pleasure to photograph him just as it's my pleasure to spend a few hours with him when he makes it to Boston. Never a dull moment with him around. --John Stephen Dwyer (talk) 08:27, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited John Schriffen, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages WCBS, NBC4 and News 12 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Stephen Dwyer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Stephen Dwyer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Stephen Dwyer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:48, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Schriffen

The article John Schriffen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. p b p 01:04, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]