User talk:JohnS HIS371
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!
I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?
I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.
You have several options freely available to you:
- If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.
- If the two of us can't agree here, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Wikipedia administrators usually abide by agreements reached through this process.
- You can keep your contributions history under a new username. Visit Wikipedia:Changing username and follow the guidelines there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cf38 (talk • contribs)
Thank you. Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you.
Welcome
[edit]Welcome and thanks for the new articles! Let me know if you need any help with the formatting or navigating around Wikipedia. Two were tagged for speedy deletion, I presume accidentally since they did not fit the critera. I have removed both tags, and can't imagine why they would be deleted. I looked into the username issue Cf38 (talk · contribs) raises above, but I don't see the problem. I have asked for clarification about it. If I can help with anything, don't hesitate to write a note on the bottom of my talk page, User_talk:TeaDrinker. Thank and again welcome! --TeaDrinker (talk) 20:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed, there is no problem with your username; it seems the message was sent in error. Thanks and let me know if you have any questions. --TeaDrinker (talk) 21:00, 21 November 2007 (UTC)