User talk:JohnRossior333

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (JohnRossior333) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Stormy clouds (talk) 19:33, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Identifying reliable sources

Hi. I am contacting you in relation to your draft article, Draft:Rubans Rouges Dance. For a draft, it is a solid effort, but has some issues which need to be addressed. Specifically, some of the many citations, listed here, will not be permissible in a main space article. Some, like the Imdb link, for instance, represent user-generated content, and cannot be included. Others are self-published sources, which will similarly not be received well, as they are not considered trustworthy for information beyond the most basic, unassailable facts. Amongst the journalistic sources used, there are also issues with reliability and trustworthiness. Sources like LA Weekly (upon which the article is heavily reliant) are overly used, and leave the impression that the article is poorly cited, due to reliance on one source, while some other sources seem to be from tabloids, and are ergo not reliable. I would suggest a review of policy regarding reliable sources, and that you perhaps amend the draft to address these issues. None of this advice aims to detract from the hard work poured into the draft; rather it stems from a wish to ameliorate it further. If you have queries about specific sources, WP:RSN is the place to ask, and if you have any general questions about editing, don't hesitate to ask, either at the Teahouse or my talk page. Hope this helps, Stormy clouds (talk) 19:33, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi JohnRossior333! You created a thread called Change a Redirect into an article at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rubans Rouges Dance has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rubans Rouges Dance. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 19:19, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rubans Rouges Dance (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by K.e.coffman were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rubans Rouges Dance and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rubans Rouges Dance, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

K.e.coffman (talk) 00:46, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JohnRossior333! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! K.e.coffman (talk) 00:46, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rubans Rouges Dance

Hello, JohnRossior333. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rubans Rouges Dance".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Snowycats (talk) 15:37, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]