User talk:JohnMoss67

This is JohnMoss67's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Taubert (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

Please remove all external links from the article's body and rephrase the text so it doesn't read like a presentation. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 03:26, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Taubert and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mark Taubert, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 03:26, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mark Taubert has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mark Taubert. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 06:37, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to get the page deleted with the specific code, but it is still there. Are you able to delete it from Drafts? JohnMoss67 (talk) 16:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mark Taubert has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mark Taubert. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 01:29, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Taubert (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia does not host profiles or sites, only encyclopedic articles that summarize what independent reliable sources have written about a subject. Please also see WP:PROMO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Taubert and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mark Taubert, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 15:55, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JohnMoss67! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 15:55, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Will take suggestions forward and will look at adding or replacing sources.

BW, John JohnMoss67 (talk) 17:17, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Have now added direct quotes from the media incl articles from reputable sources like the Guardian and the Telegraph. JohnMoss67 (talk) 13:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Taubert (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not clear that they meet WP:PROF and letter to Bowie seems to be WP:BIO1E.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Taubert and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mark Taubert, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 10:09, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC)

The European Association for Palliative Care was established in Milan, Italy in 1988 and was the initiative of Professor Vittorio Ventafridda and the Floriani Foundation.

The aims of the organisation were to:

Create and increase awareness of palliative care throughout Europe and beyond
Increase awareness and promote the development and dissemination of palliative care at scientific, clinical and social levels
Promote learning, development and research in palliative care
Support scientific and educational events promoting the development of palliative care
Promote and sponsor publications or periodicals concerning palliative care
Bring together those who study and practice the disciplines involved in the care of patients with advanced disease (doctors, nurses, social workers, psychologists, and volunteers)
Unify national palliative care organisations and establish an international network for the exchange of information and expertise
Address the ethical problems associated with the care of the terminally ill

The founding members recognised the importance of education as a tool for developing palliative care throughout Europe and in one of their early meetings, they made the decision to host the first EAPC World Palliative Care Congress in Paris, France in 1990. At this early stage, the board recognised the important role of nurses and noted their essential role and impact on the development of palliative care in healthcare systems across Europe.

Led by their shared vision for greater access and improved palliative care throughout Europe, Professor Ventafridda and his early board colleagues: Elisabeth Killander, Derek Doyle, Charles-Henri Rapin, Franco De Conno, Xavier Gómez Batiste-Alentorn, Jeanne Gray Simpson, Frances Sheldon and Giorgio Di Mola, established the foundations of what is now a successful and sustainable Europe-wide membership organisation, which has had and continues to have a positive impact on the development of palliative care throughout Europe and beyond.

Mission Statement

The European Association for Palliative Care is a membership organisation dedicated to the promotion and development of palliative care throughout Europe.

Mission:

To promote the development of high quality palliative care across the life span by fostering and sharing palliative care education, research, policy and evidence-based practice.

Vision:

One voice, one vision: A world without preventable suffering where those with life-threatening illnesses and their families have timely access to high quality palliative care as an integral part of the healthcare system.

Core Values:

Strive for excellence in palliative care
Value interdisciplinary working and representation
Respect diversity and promote inclusion
Work collaboratively

Strategic Objectives

To enable the EAPC to promote the development of high quality palliative care in Europe and beyond, the EAPC strategic objectives are to:

Support global advocacy organisations and other initiatives seeking to develop palliative care in resource poor countries around the world
Be a strong, successful and sustainable European membership organisation focused on palliative care
Through education to increase awareness, knowledge and skills related to palliative care for health care workers, the public and volunteers
Improve and strengthen the ways we engage with our members
Support and disseminate research and development on all aspects of palliative care
Support and promote the development and integration of palliative care in countries throughout Europe
Support the development and progression of palliative care education for all of those working in palliative care
Acknowledge the importance of the role of palliative care policy development and be an effective and powerful advocate for access to, and improvement of palliative care throughout Europe
Facilitate the ongoing development of palliative care leadership nationally and internationally
Collaborate effectively with affiliated organisations and seek opportunities to foster new collaborations and partnerships

The EAPC values diversity and is committed to being a fully inclusive organisation. You can read our Equality Diversity and Inclusion Policy here JohnMoss67 (talk) 13:28, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mark Taubert

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mark Taubert requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dan arndt (talk) 03:39, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Taubert (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Close but not quite enough significant, independent coverage. Not many hits on Scholar.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Taubert and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 04:18, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Taubert has been accepted

Mark Taubert, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Seawolf35 ^T--C 23:58, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]