User talk:John9988/Archive 1

Archive 1

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Talk:Lady Gaga has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 00:32, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

I used popups for the first time and made a mistake. Sorry! --John9988 (talk) 00:36, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Ok, sorry for the misunderstanding Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 00:37, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

User talk

Easy there, please use brain brain before you edit...not your dancing shoe. The talk page is just that talk!!!, suggestions , ideas and question????. It was is NOT the main article. You are trying to control questions and public speech. There is a reason why there is a discussion page was implemented.

You need to seriously get a life, and a real job. Why are you deleting questions, and ideas on a "DISCUSSION PAGE". Its just that...discussion. The question was that the page could easily be a marketing page, as it most of the the contributors seems to be the same people going when you look at the history contributions. The page seem to have more references that anything on Wikipedia, and the general public is generally lazy to to that extent. My question pertained to marketing...as marketers are insipid and are using anything and everything on the internet.

Are you part of the marketing team of Lady Gaga? Is that why you renmoved a revelant question on a discussion page??

""Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Lady Gaga. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starbwoy (talk • contribs) 17:03, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Please read WP:CIVIL and WP:VAND. Nonsensical edits can be removed from articles and talk pages. There's no evidence for the claims you made, such as this one. And it seems you tried to hide the fact that you wrote that comment by removing the edit by SineBot with this edit. The article is well-referenced with plenty of reliable sources, so you don't really have a valid argument. --John9988 (talk) 01:44, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Mr. Phd, yeas...that part of the ability of Wikipidia. Wow yes you can edit and remove thing...just like how you delteed and remove the questions I wrote. So No it was not hidden it was placed in the wrong place I deleted, and rewritten in the right place. I could of left it on your main personal page. I'm not a marketer like you, using Wikipedia for clients, so I'm not a pro at it. So what are you hiding????. Who are your clients. Starbwoy (talk) 17:33, 26 March 2011 (UTC)