User talk:John48

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.
(info: block log • contributions • deleted contributions • page moves • current autoblocks)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

John48 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

what the hell? i don't even know jagzthebest. why does it say to look at my contributions? i have never even edited anything that jagzthebest has edited. i am using a public computer. i don't know who jagzthebest is.

Decline reason:

Even if you're not Jagzthebest, then please explain why your very first edit was to harass an established editor? -- Netsnipe ► 04:38, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was trying to talk to my friend Mike, but I didn't know how to PM him. I didn't know if that was the right place to put it. John48 07:11, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure you were, just so you could leave a personal attack. I think this user was also 71.125.87.79 as the auto blocked IP and this IP came from the same city. (Paterson, New Jersey) That IP also has similar edits to the Jagsthebest socks. --Michael Greiner 13:56, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that that was so open that everybody could see it. If you don't want to talk on there than that is okay with me. That is not a personal attack and that IP does not have similar edits to the Jagsthebest socks. At least know what you are talking about before you start idiotically accusing people. John48 16:48, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

John48 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I explained like you asked.

Decline reason:

A personal attack followed by more personal attacks here. Yeah, unblock declined. — Yamla 20:00, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

John48 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That was just one barely a personal attack at the very end in response to a personal attack on me on my own talk page. I shouldn't have been blocked in the first place! I didn't even get a warning. I didn't make any at the beginning at all. How come the other guy isn't blocked for making a personal attack? Can someone explain to me why I was blocked before? Why am I even blocked now without a warning? I can't even write on my own user page. This is the only page I can discuss on. This is the only page where I can get help?

Decline reason:

There was no personal attack on your talk page, and do you mean when you were blocked as Jagzthebest by "blocked before"? Obvious sockpuppets are blocked on sight, by the way. — Malcolm (talk) 00:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

John48 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

But I am not Jagzthebest and I am not a sockpuppet. I was personally attacked because the article on personal attacks says "Accusing someone without justification of making personal attacks is also considered a form of personal attack." I shouldn't have been blocked at all because I already explained that I am not a sockpuppet.

Decline reason:

Enough chat. `'Míkka 02:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.