User talk:Joheba
Welcome
[edit] A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10... 100... 200
And here are several pages on things to avoid:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) - if you click on the button it will automatically insert your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Also, please consider joining the the adopt-a-user project, where advanced editors can guide you in your first experiences here. Feel free to delete this template if you don't want it. Again, welcome!
|
ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:37, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]Hi, welcome. I've nominated your article for deletion. Please let me know if you have questions. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:19, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Superior Taste Award
[edit]An article that you have been involved in editing, Superior Taste Award, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superior Taste Award. Thank you. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:19, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- The key to content additions and new article creation is wp:notability. The basis for notability is substantial coverage in independent sources. All I see for this subject is a press release from the organization and citations to the organization itself. If there is substantial coverage in independent sources like magazines, newspapers, or books, that would demonstrate the subject meets guidelines for inclusion. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:36, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the note. When there aren't good sources for a sbuejct that's a problem. But sometimes people decide to keep an article anyway. It's no bother at all and I'm happy to help in any way I can. People watch each other's pages so I'm sure some of my talk page fans will check out the article and try to improve it.
Press releases aren't much use as far as whether an article is worth keeping in the encyclopedia, but articles in foreign languages can be included. Add them in and make sure to mention them in the deletion discussion. There are many people who would be happy to translate too if needed. We try not to have an English language bias...
Anyone can remove the "flags" (templates) and anyone can add them back. My personal opinion is that they should be included until independent sources with substantial coverage are found. If there are no good reliable sources it's very hard to improve an article. But we'll see what happens with the deletion discussion. If you want help from Wikipedia's most famous article rescuer you can try asking user:MichaelQSchmidt very nicely on his talk page. If he can't help, maybe no one can. :) But nothing is deleted forever, and articles can always be recreated in your userspace and worked on or kept until there is coverage that would make the subject notable. That being said, I have no idea what decision the community will make on the article I proposed for deletion or the other I tagged for notability. You can also discuss the articles and any ideas you have for improving them on the article talk page.
Please if you have any further questions or I haven't answered well, do not hesitate to ask me again and I will be happy to help or at least point you in the right direction. Good luck. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:34, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Nomination of European Beer Star for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article European Beer Star is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Beer Star until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 07:37, 1 July 2020 (UTC)