User talk:Joeymiskulin

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia as of January 2019 due to an indefinite account block after not getting revenge on NinjaRobotPirate.

January 2018

Hi Joeymiskulin. I am Diannaa and I am an administrator on this wiki. I have removed content from your talk page that you appear to have copied here from Wikia. We already had an article on this topic, The Secret Musical Life of Pets, and it was deleted as being a hoax. Please don't re-add this material to Wikipedia, not on your talk page or in a sandbox or article space. We don't want it if the film does not exist, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place to collect made-up stuff. Besides, the purpose of your talk page is communication with other editors, not for creating drafts or adding content. If you need help with Wikipedia, please consider visiting the Teahouse or letting me know on my talk page. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:31, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello Joeymiskulin and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to List of SpongeBob SquarePants merchandise, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Eagleash (talk) 12:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from article as you did at the SpongeBob page, without addressing the issues concerned. Please also stop deleting the links to episode list sections or pages from Infoboxes. Please remember to complete the edit summary when saving your edits. This is important as it tells other editors what has been changed and why. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 12:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Production logo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mia and Me, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Adrian Moore and Gerhard Hahn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hello, I'm AlexTheWhovian. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Defenders (miniseries) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Alex^TW 05:48, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Alex^TW 05:49, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. -- Alex^TW 05:55, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BoogerD. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Defenders (miniseries) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. BoogerD (talk) 06:01, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sit Down, Shut Up (2009 TV series), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. BoogerD (talk) 06:03, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Bordertown (2016 TV series), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. BoogerD (talk) 06:07, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at 3 South. BoogerD (talk) 06:07, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am notifying you that there is an ongoing discussion regarding your editing history occurring over at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. – BoogerD (talk) 06:24, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Ice Age: Continental Drift. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. See MOS:PERIOD Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:49, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Ice Age: Continental Drift. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Bogus category Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:52, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Joeymiskulin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Carols by Candlelight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to King Edward Park

Mister Maker Comes to Town (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chris Burton

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:16, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here}}. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:27, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joeymiskulin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to get unblocked

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 04:01, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Okay, I'm sorry. I need to be retiring from Wikipedia. Joeymiskulin (talk) 04:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to do that, that is your choice; if you change your mind and want to be unblocked, in your request you will need to discuss why you were blocked, what steps you will take to not do it again, and what constructive contributions you want to make instead. 331dot (talk) 10:28, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]