User talk:Joeybwong79
September 2019
[edit]Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Adele, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:23, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
The article Michael Ashton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
None of the sources provided pass muster for reliability given that this is a biography on a living person, and a Google search does not turn up any other sources that would suggest that Mr. Ashton passes Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 20:51, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Michael Ashton
[edit]Hello, Joeybwong79,
Thank you for creating Michael Ashton.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please read our policy on biographies of living persons; in particular, any contentious material on a living person that is unsourced or poorly-sourced must be removed immediately.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John M Wolfson}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
– John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 15:49, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
@John M Wolfson: The lsat message I received that I have 1 week to improve the page, otherwise the page will be deleted. Is that mean that as long as I can imporve the page, the page will remind here ? Joeybwong79 (talk) 16:11, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- That was a proposed deletion; by removing the notice you (irrevocably) cancelled the proposed deletion and thus rendered the "7 days" null and void, which is fine. Usually we prefer that you "prepare" articles as drafts, but the current state of the article means it can stay as an article for now. Please be aware of the biographies policy; if the article doesn't meet that policy it may have to be deleted via a discussion. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 16:16, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
@John M Wolfson: GREAT! I will go ahead and have a look