User talk:Joey P. x Natalia Evyanova

March 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Jesus, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Meters (talk) 03:22, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at UY Scuti, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 03:24, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of largest stars, you may be blocked from editing. Arianewiki1 (talk) 04:47, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for no blocks

Thanks. We will not be stopped! --Joey P. knows a lot about that and Natalia Evyanova 03:48, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Miracle Planet has been reverted.
Your edit here to Miracle Planet was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zc6IAigFkV4) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:28, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to edit....

You need to go back to your original account and open up a discussion. Not make socks. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:35, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joey P. x Natalia Evyanova (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Then please unblock our accounts. I know I should not have started edit wars and advertise. Please unblock my account and inform a steward to unlock my account. Please listen and forgive me. Or set the block time to three months. Not indefinitely. --Joey P. knows a lot about that! and Natalia Evyanova 06:37, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Please make unblock requests only from your main account. Socks will not be unblocked. So Why 08:27, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joey P. x Natalia Evyanova (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

But our original accounts (User:JoeyPknowsalotaboutthat) and (User:Ilikechristians/Natalia Evyanova) are globally locked. Please inform a steward to unlock our accounts. We are very apologetic for letting Joey's niece and our archnemesis make sock accounts. --Joey P. knows a lot about that! and Natalia Evyanova 18:13, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Talk page access revoked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 18:25, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of KIC 9246715

Hello, Joey P. x Natalia Evyanova. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, KIC 9246715, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Lithopsian (talk) 18:33, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]