User talk:Joesmith12345

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lee Zeldin.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Lee Zeldin was changed by Joesmith12345 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860986 on 2015-06-04T17:46:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.200.154.18 (talk) 01:31, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lee Zeldin, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 15:11, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Lee Zeldin, you may be blocked from editing. If you have a valid reason for removing the content, please discuss is at Talk:Lee Zeldin to gain a consensus to removed the sourced content. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:20, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Lee Zeldin shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 16:37, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:30, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lee Zeldin.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Lee Zeldin was changed by Joesmith12345 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860986 on 2015-06-04T17:46:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:46, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Lee Zeldin. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Huon (talk) 17:50, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Rep. Zeldin official headshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rep. Zeldin official headshot.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for resumption of edit-warring at Lee Zeldin. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 21:40, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Lee Zeldin, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 17:38, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for resumption of edit-warring at Lee Zeldin. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Tiderolls 19:23, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You've convinced me that you will not cease your disruptive behavior. You will have to convince another administrator that you understand and can follow Wikipedia policy and convention to regain your editing privilege. Tiderolls 19:23, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]