User talk:Joel Michael

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Joel Michael! I am Marcus Qwertyus and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome!

Marcus Qwertyus 05:05, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Milton Friedman. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Marcus Qwertyus 08:10, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I left a message explaining why and also wrote about it in Talk. I do not agree with your reasoning for reverting it. Can you find me an example of any other distorted portrait photos on Wikipedia, when better ones exist? There are plenty of other articles without photos, so there is precedent for that. I'd like to have a decent photo there but don't know how to discover the copyright status of photos. Perhaps with your seasoned expertise you can take a look at the talk page and determine if the photo linked there is a viable replacement. Joel Michael (talk) 08:31, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The photo linked is not free. Theoretically one could a picture of someone's foot in a dark room with the lens cap on and it could still be used to illustrate someone's article. It doesn't have to be pretty. Marcus Qwertyus 08:58, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Monty Hall

Hi Joel - the arbitration case is not about the content of the article but about the behaviour of some of the editors. I don't see how you evidence is relevant and as a case clerk will probably remove it unless you want to. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 11:03, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]