User talk:Joebutchwiki

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joebutchwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

according to my user page i have been banned because CheckUser evidence confirms that the operator has abusively used multiple accounts. I would like to affirm that i am not using multiple accounts. This is my real name (see linkedin) and my edits have been towards making the page more accurate and a neutral POV. I have only edited the jg page but would like to play around with wikipedia more across multiple pages. I'm guessing the evidence of multiple accounts is from me being on my work ip and someone else using the same ip?

Decline reason:

You were blocked based on evidence that you are the same user as AnonymousEye HighInBC 19:43, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

See WP:DUCK. If you wont accept the reality then your talk page access will be revoked. FixCop (talk) 15:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I have no idea who AnonymousEye is or if he is on my ip range but it is most definitely not me. Looking over the changes. One example of a change i made was updating the key people. 2 of the key people no longer work at the company - WikiStable reversed my edit to outdated information quoting "JG Employee removed facts that reflect negatively on JG. As Oshwah will agree the changes were did not have a neutral POV. I wont press the issue any further but if someone can look deeper it would be appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joebutchwiki (talk • contribs) 19:52, 24 May 2016‎

We are not guessing, there is technical evidence. HighInBC 19:55, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]