User talk:Joe or Bob

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joe or Bob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not breached any Wikipedia rule. I have made only three edits in three weeks : two of which were scientifically correct on a talk page that have not been challenged by anybody, and a web site that is directly relevant to the James Parkinson article. The web site contains no adverts at all, so can not be possibly be described as spam. I do not know what is meant by General Tojo, so I can not respond to it.

Decline reason:

It's explained on your userpage.— chaser - t 22:50, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joe or Bob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I see what you refer to, but I am not much the wiser. As it is unrelated to me, I don't see of what significance it is anyway.

Decline reason:

Being a sockpuppet of a banned user automatically gets you an indef block. —[[Animum | talk]] 01:35, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock|I understand that, but I am not a "sockpuppet of anyone". My IP address does not remotely coincide with the range given for "General Tojo". I see no evidence whatsoever justifying blocking. My sole action was to add a web site that contains no adverts or promotion of any kind, so it can not possibly be described as spam. It would be deceitful for anyone to claim that it was.The web site is very relevant to the page it was added to. The web site is on on virtually all other Parkinson's Disease web sites, and is presently being made use of and discussed on many of them. More people will undoubtedly add the web site over the years because of its relevance to the article. The web site is clearly not even anything to do with "General Tojo" who it is claimed lives in Longford, England, because a WHOIS search readily shows that the web site is owned by an AMERICAN company and has nothing to do with any individual in Longford, England.

Protected page due to abuse of unblock template, that this new user that claims not to be a tojo sock despite behaving like tojo on tojo topics found rather quickly. -- Chris 73 | Talk 05:44, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]