User talk:Joe 50 50 50

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joe 50 50 50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Joe 50 50 50

Decline reason:

Hogwash. You are obviously the same person I renamed and unblocked earlier.Don't know what your problem is, but we are happy to block you to stop your disruption.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:10, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why am I blocked for no reason?!! This is my first time creating a Wikipedia account. How can I be blocked for having multiple accounts if I only opened one? I think this block was personal as I edited a page with a factual source to backup my claim. This block is completely unjustifiable and I should be unblocked!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joe 50 50 50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Joe 50 50 50

Decline reason:

This is clearly the same person as the former Rob69 69 69. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 23:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What are you talking about? I have no clue who you are referring to and why I have been blocked. This is my first Wikipedia account so I don’t know what you are saying. I don’t appreciate your tone and you accusing me for something that I did not do! Joe 50 50 50 (talk) 22:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon: That's what I said!-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:50, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ima revoke talk page access if needed. Please don't make it needed. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:52, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did not even do anything! Why are you picking on me? I literally don’t know what you are talking about. I only have this account. I literally just joined today and this is how I am treated… This feels more like a personal attack than anything else. Joe 50 50 50 (talk) 03:14, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, now you're just a liar. Both accounts are now checkuser blocked and talk page revoked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:04, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.