User talk:JoeKZ03

Welcome!

Hello, JoeKZ03! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Cassiopeia talk 22:19, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

January 2022

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Conor McGregor, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 22:18, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UFC rankings

Hi JoeKZO3, when updating UFC rankings, pls use the date as per UFC rankings site, updated also the reference especially the date and all rankings (male and female). Any thing that is not properly updated will be reedited by other editors which just rework on all the articles.22:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC) Cassiopeia talk 22:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UFC 278, UFC Fight Night 209 and UFC Fight Night 210

Hi JoeK03, Good day, pls note that your edits on the above page have been reverted. Pls do not change the event name until it is official in UFC event page. Cassiopeia talk 01:40, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm Lol1VNIO. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Brandon Moreno—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 16:16, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Your recent editing history at UFC on ESPN: dos Anjos vs. Fiziev shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Additional text Sdpdude9 (talk) 04:38, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

fuck off neckbeard JoeKZ03 (talk) 04:44, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at UFC on ESPN: dos Anjos vs. Fiziev. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 04:45, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at UFC on ESPN: dos Anjos vs. Fiziev, you may be blocked from editing. Cassiopeia talk 04:45, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at UFC on ESPN: dos Anjos vs. Fiziev. Cassiopeia talk 04:46, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at UFC on ESPN: dos Anjos vs. Fiziev. Cassiopeia talk 04:49, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at UFC on ESPN: dos Anjos vs. Fiziev. Cassiopeia talk 04:49, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at UFC on ESPN: dos Anjos vs. Fiziev. Cassiopeia talk 04:51, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Rafael dos Anjos. Cassiopeia talk 04:56, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:JoeKZ03, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Cassiopeia talk 05:21, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

how many times must i tell you that i dont give a fuck?? just fuckin ban me JoeKZ03 (talk) 05:22, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:JoeKZ03, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Cassiopeia talk 05:21, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass other editors. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 05:24, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i aint harassing no one but if you think so then fuckin ban me already all you moderators suck JoeKZ03 (talk) 05:25, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UFC on ESPN: dos Anjos vs. Fiziev

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Cassiopeia talk 04:48, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop changing the fight method. Its not open for interpretation. Wiki policy is to use Sherdog. Nswix (talk) 05:11, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

go fuck urself JoeKZ03 (talk) 05:11, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 05:14, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

this message is being sent to inform you that i dont give a fuck JoeKZ03 (talk) 05:18, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Daniel Case (talk) 05:46, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]