User talk:Jobacarlisle
Speedy deletion of Paulman berg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Paulman berg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Leonard^Bloom (talk) 03:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Please note that this is an encyclopedia, and as such we are more interested in the true history of the band rather than any mythology they might have created about themselves. For example, giving a band member the biography of George Washington Carver is unlikely to help establish the notability and verifiability of this band. I recommend a rewrite to tell the band's story in straightforward style instead. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:16, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- In regard to the postings on my user talk page about Paulman Berg, I moved them to the bottom of the page to be in chronological order. The short answer about what was wrong with the Paulman berg page is that it didn't contain any straightforward, accurate content. It was all jokes and exaggerations. There was nothing to put the band's satirical story into context, and Wikipedia is more interested in the actual story rather than the satire anyway. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:49, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Paulman Berg
[edit]
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Paulman Berg, you will be blocked from editing. Cunard (talk) 18:43, 18 June 2008 (UTC)