User talk:JoarFF

Talk:Incel

Please use the preview button instead of making multiple edits that could be done in one. It's disruptive. You've made 41 edits to the talk page in a single hour. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:45, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I left this on your IP talk page before you were blocked - I suggest following these instructions before your account gets indeffed. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:08, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok, no problem. I have a mental disorder which causes that issue, that I do on all sites, and it's not meant to be disruptive. JoarFF (talk) 15:09, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

well, I'm sorry to hear that but we still require the same thing of all editors. Learn to use the preview button and organize your thoughts in one or two edits as opposed to the 40+ you've made in an hour. Failure to do so is likely to wind up with you being blocked. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:23, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Please consider this your final warning. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:36, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since this warning you've made several edits that you were asked not to. Was my warning in any way unclear? I hope you will actually reflect on this and leave the talk page alone for a bit, otherwise I will request a block at WP:ANI, which will include your ability to edit as an account or an IP. PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My edits on Megan Twohey are disruptive? I disagree JoarFF (talk) 16:59, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're going to block me for writing about the SanctionedSuicide expose? Your wiki advertises itself as a wiki anyone can edit, and your WP's bad pages are disruptive to a fair and just/moral/civil society, hence the calls for improvement JoarFF (talk) 17:01, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't my wiki, it belongs to no one but your inability to string together a coherent thought in less than 50 edits is disruptive. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:02, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia let an admin here make 80k+ edits with fraudulent redirects about questionable subject matters and you want to ban me for OCD on on accepted civil edits to talk page discussions, gross JoarFF (talk) 17:04, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Will. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:07, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Routine alert re Discretionary sanctions for gender issues

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 15:37, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]