User talk:JoanneNaoum

This is JoanneNaoum's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

There are two other drafts for the same guy at Draft:Salim Sfeir and Draft:Salim G. Sfeir no need for a third.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:JoanneNaoum/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:JoanneNaoum/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering^(t) 18:03, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JoanneNaoum! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whispering^(t) 18:03, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Salim Sfeir, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:JoanneNaoum/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:JoanneNaoum/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 06:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salim G. Sfeir (December 28)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Does not meet WP:ANYBIO; significant RS coverage not found.

K.e.coffman (talk) 01:23, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Salim Sfeir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Salim Sfeir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salim Sfeir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:16, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Look at other articles about people. The references are interspersed in the text, as support for the content in the text, not as a list under External Links. And the refs should not just be URLS, i.e., starting with http.... David notMD (talk) 12:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How the AfD process works: At least seven days for editors to leave Keep, Delete or Comment comments. At the end, an Administrator makes a decision. More important to improve the article than to leave a comment, but do leave a Keep identifying yourself as the creator and making a brief statement why Dr. Sfeir is notable. David notMD (talk) 12:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi JoanneNaoum! You created a thread called How to contribute in a debate? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi JoanneNaoum! You created a thread called Follow-up to How to contribute in a debate? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

At the deletion discussion

Any comments from you should be started with the word Comment in bold, not Keep. Each person gets one recommendation (KEEP or DELETE). After that, comments. And "Thank you" stuff would be better placed on the Talk page of the person you want to thank. David notMD (talk) 04:06, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]