User talk:JoJaEpp

Welcome

Welcome to my talk page! Please post any comments you have.

Thank you,

Canadian Loyalists

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Canadian Loyalists. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Loyalists (American Revolution)#Emigration. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Loyalists (American Revolution)#Emigration - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Safiel (talk) 23:15, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Loyalists of North America listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Loyalists of North America. Since you had some involvement with the The Loyalists of North America redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). 70.24.247.61 (talk) 04:21, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of most popular dog breeds, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of most popular dog breeds was changed by JoJaEpp (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862846 on 2011-11-12T06:01:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:01, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Template:Canidae graphical timeline has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:46, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Canidae with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:51, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Snow leopard appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 02:45, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, JoJaEpp. You have new messages at JamesBWatson's talk page.
Message added 02:48, 17 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Calabe 1992 02:48, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral point of view

Regarding your edit, a neutral point of view means don't puff up an article with superlatives that do not contribute to the facts. Please see WP:NPOV Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 02:53, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, JoJaEpp. You have new messages at Calabe1992's talk page.
Message added 06:33, 19 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Calabe 1992 06:33, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please be civil when dealing with other editors on Wikipedia. Your unfriendly remarks at User talk:Calabe1992 were quite unnecessary. You were dealing with someone who had made a good faith attempt to contribute to a discussion, and if you thought that the contribution was unhelpful you could have said so politely. In addition, nothing in Wikipedia is private, and an editor does not own a talk page discussion that they have started, and no editor has the right to deny another editor access to a talk page discussion. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:46, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Canidae

Did you see what I said on your talk page? JoJaEpp (talk) 00:20, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:JoJaEpp/Hato La Fe has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hato La Fe, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 01:32, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

  Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed.  Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hato La Fe.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively, you can ask for help via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! :- ) DCS 23:00, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, JoJaEpp. You have new messages at Dcshank's talk page.
Message added 01:07, 16 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

:- ) DCS 01:07, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re your recent edits at JTF 2

Per WP:OVERLINK, please do not link dates or months. Cheers, CharlieEchoTango (contact) 01:21, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, JoJaEpp. You have new messages at Dcshank's talk page.
Message added 01:39, 16 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

:- ) DCS 01:39, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited Mermaid Sapphire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ROV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:17, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for the change of 2012 Earthquake Magnitude Data

Dear Joja,

The magnitude data has been changed in accordance to USGS US Geological Survey, and with full research. USGS updated the data from, 8.7 to 8.6, please do your research before hand Earthquake Magnitude. Salman 04:31, 15 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samsujata (talk • contribs)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Halifax Explosion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TNT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:14, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello, JoJaEpp. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Fast + Epp, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. I RadioFan (talk) 00:12, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, JoJaEpp. You have new messages at RadioFan's talk page.
Message added 14:09, 22 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

RadioFan (talk) 14:09, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hato La Fe concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hato La Fe, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:39, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Hato La Fe

Hello JoJaEpp. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Hato La Fe.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hato La Fe}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:25, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Canada has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 05:49, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Canada

Howdy. Justin Trudeau won't become Prime Minister of Canada, until 4 November 2015. Please be patient :) GoodDay (talk) 05:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Please read before you write. There's been a comment there for a while. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:03, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JoJaEpp. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions/1RR/consensus required notices

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 19:47, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on George Soros; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
George Soros is under discretionary sanctions; your edit violates those restrictions. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 19:49, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]