User talk:JoBrodie

How can I change the name and pagename of someone?

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page.

Actress Yaya DaCosta is now named as Yaya Alafia (her IMDb page: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1861624/) - ought we / can we amend her Wikipedia page to reflect this change? How? Thanks :) JoBrodie (talk) 09:47, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Can we?" - Yes. "How?" - I'll tell you below. "Ought we?" More difficult. The policy on article titles says "Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it prefers to use the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources." (See WP:COMMONNAME.) A Google search for "Yaya DaCosta" -"Yaya Alafia" gave me about 1,720,000 hits, while "Yaya Alafia" -"Yaya DaCosta" gave me only about 2,800, suggesting that "Yaya DaCosta" is still overwhelmingly the commoner. However, there are all sorts of other considerations that that simple Google search doesn't address, such as how many of the hits are old, how many are in reliable sources, etc etc. My feeling is, however, that in this case the preponderance of the old name is so great (more than 600 times more common) that I would leave the article where it is, and create a redirect to it at Yaya Alafia. However, if you wish to consider renaming it, you should check the policy Wikipedia:Article titles first. I have added a note to the article Yaya DaCosta mentioning the change of name.

Even if you don't rename this article, it may be helpful to you to know how to do it for future reference. Somewhere in the row of links near the top of the Wikipedia page (article, talk, edit, etc) there is a link that says "move". If you use the default Wikipedia interface, it usually hides this link, and you have to point your mouse at a little downward-pointing triangle to make it show up. (This is one of the many irritating features of the current default interface which lead me to use another, older interface instead.) If you click on that link, you will see a form to move/rename a page. There is a label "To new title:" on the page, and near it you will find a box containing the text "Yaya DaCosta". Replace that with "Yaya Alafia", put a brief explanation in the box labelled "Reason:" and click on "move page". JamesBWatson (talk) 11:57, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help and advice - the addition of the clarification to her page seems fine, I think I will leave it at that for now, thank you :) JoBrodie (talk) 22:51, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have created a redirect at Yaya Alafia, so that anyone searching for her under that name will find the article. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:52, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, JoBrodie, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the help desk or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Shimgray 15:59, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Insulin analogues

Thanks for fixing my spelling error in the article. Someone has removed the images for the article: [1] Saying that they may represent copyright infringement. Maybe you can help decide. I listed them as promotional images since they came from the promotional kit given at the drug rep dinner. With over 600 editors, each has their own opinion of what is infringement. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 17:02, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Dont forget to turn on your email. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 17:07, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - I have turned on my email (I think)... Anyway, I like the pictures but the decision may be bigger than all of us as if they do infringe copyright I can imagine all sorts of woes and annoyances if a company decided to get shirty. Perhaps asking the company's (Novo Nordisk was one I think) if they wouldn't mind? Personally I can't see a problem as long as the owner of a picture is properly attributed, but presumably lawyers have a business to earn and so will create a problem where there was none in the first place ;-) JoBrodie 18:06, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: I've written a draft stub article for the film Whole Lotta Sole

Re your message: Feel free to create a new article. The version I deleted was somebody's idea of a bad joke and there is nothing worth salvaging from it. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:51, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Created page for Whole Lotta Sole film

I've done a site:en.wikipedia.org "whole lotta sole" Google search to uncover any pages where the film's mentioned to check everything's linked up correctly and tweaked wherever it wasn't. JoBrodie (talk) 01:21, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Whole Lotta Sole movie poster.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Whole Lotta Sole movie poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:36, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Whole Lotta Sole poster.pdf

A tag has been placed on File:Whole Lotta Sole poster.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sumanch (talk) 00:37, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

::

I've replied on your [talk page] - I'm afraid I couldn't find (on the pages to do with the image file) the button marked "Click here to contest..." Best, JoBrodie (talk) 10:43, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Whole Lotta Sole poster.pdf

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Whole Lotta Sole poster.pdf. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 01:03, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Live blood analysis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Advertising Standards Authority (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Film music concerts has been accepted

Film music concerts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:38, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wave in passing

Hi :-) Guy (Help!) 00:12, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello :) JoBrodie (talk) 16:19, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JoBrodie. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JoBrodie. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CEASE therapy has been accepted

CEASE therapy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 23:16, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarah Angliss (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Frayae was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sarah Angliss and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sarah Angliss, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 13:40, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JoBrodie! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 13:40, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarah Angliss has been accepted

Sarah Angliss, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 19:18, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, JoBrodie. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of Twitter traditions

Hello, I went ahead and added the "underconstruction" tag on the page. It was my first few experiences here that incomplete pages in mainspace are speedily deleted without much ado. Plus, the page needs layout fixing too. Merry Christmas. Csgir (talk) 11:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the external links I see on the current draft - rethink about adding them. Adding external links in the body text is one of the signals indicating "paid" editing. If you are doing paid editing, disclose it on your user page. Csgir (talk) 11:27, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks :) Definitely not being paid to edit so I suppose I had better add them as references instead. Thanks for the tip JoBrodie (talk) 11:50, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Autism quackery has been nominated for discussion

Category:Autism quackery, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:49, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Attempting to be kosher while not spending too much time

Sorry to be so slap-dash. It's very important to appeal to a broader audience, I hope you can see the wisdom in that. Maybe one mind will be changed. That's how you change the world, one person at a time...thanks The Old Lady AKA Jrbwalk (talk) 14:38, 8 January 2019 (UTC)jrbwalk[reply]

@Jrbwalk: I'm all for improving it - having a breather though as I seem to have spent an age on Wikipedia over the last week. There's a sort of endlessness to the tinkering :)

@JoBrodie: it's looking interesting, and other minds are entering into it. I'm glad to see the basic info being fleshed out.Thanks for letting me in. I'll look back every once in a while, especially if I come across new information as it continues to enter the news. Good luck!Jrbwalk (talk) 15:46, 14 January 2019 (UTC)jrbwalk[reply]

Deletion discussion about List of Twitter traditions

Hello, JoBrodie,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Citrivescence and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, List of Twitter traditions should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Twitter traditions .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Citrivescence (talk) 02:36, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alliance of Registered Homeopaths

The article Alliance of Registered Homeopaths has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficiently notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexbrn (talk) 08:11, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Guy Macon (talk) 01:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Zero issues with your edits. I am just hitting everyone on the Jenny McCarthy page that hasn't received a pseudoscience and fringe science discretionary sanctions alert in the last year) --Guy Macon (talk) 01:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amulet (film)

Hello, JoBrodie,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Nsk92 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Amulet (film), for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nsk92}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nsk92 (talk) 23:12, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nsk92: Hello :) Thank you for alerting me. I've now added a bit more information to the film's page (a recent comment from the producer, interviewed in Variety magazine), removed the 'proposed deletion' panel and defended the edit/panel removal in both the edit comments and on the Talk page. Fingers crossed the page survives :) JoBrodie (talk) 10:04, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greenwich Pier talk

Just cos it makes me laugh - 'Trivia' - [[2]]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding citation

Hi, I saw your addition to the List of Streisand effect examples. Can you provide a source that's not Dan's website itself or his Twitter account? Independent sources are important so that all viewpoints are represented and not just the creator's viewpoint. Ca ^{talk to me!} 02:06, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]