User talk:Jnkates
Welcome
[edit]
|
Maintenance tags
[edit]Please do not remove maintenance tags unless you've addressed the issues mentioned. The article needs cleanup to comply with manual of style recommendations (the ALL CAPS in particular), it needs to have appropriate wikilinks added, and most importantly, it needs additional sources independent of the subject for biographical verification. Acroterion (talk) 04:21, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- In reply to your question, biographical articles must be supported by sources independent of the subject: self-sourcing is generally discouraged because most people aren't very objective about themselves, which makes for bad encyclopedia entries. See WP:RS, WP:V and WP:BLP. WP:SELFPUB is of note here: I'm sure the information is accurate, but other sources would be better. Please find independent reliable sources to support the article; this is crucial. Otherwise, please make the all-caps entries read as normal text, and where you can link to another article (such as Seinfeld) you can put double square brackets on either side of the first instance of the words you want linked. If you can do those things, it would be great - I'll be glad to help, but will be going to bed shortly, so I must sign off. The subject is clearly notable (thanks for getting her into WP!), so there's no concern there. Acroterion (talk) 04:51, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- By the way, iMDB isn't usable as a source, since, like WP, it's user-generated. It's useful as a guide, but can't be usefully cited. Acroterion (talk) 04:58, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- I've looked over the article, and you've done a great job. I'll see if I can tidy some of the references so they're not bare URLs. There are a few quibbles: you should probably adopt a more deadpan (i.e. dull), encyclopedic style ("renowned" isn't commonly seen in encyclopedias), but I think it's excellent work for a first article in such a user-unfriendly interface as Wikipedia. Nobody can get the references right without a lot of practice. Acroterion (talk) 01:22, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- If you can find a published reference to birth date and birthplace, that'd be great: I didn't see it in the Times link (and I know that you know what it is), but it's nice to have a published reference. Also, Seinfeld Scripts is, like Wikipedia, a self-published source, and should be avoided in favor of sources with more editorial oversight. Acroterion (talk) 01:43, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- I've looked over the article, and you've done a great job. I'll see if I can tidy some of the references so they're not bare URLs. There are a few quibbles: you should probably adopt a more deadpan (i.e. dull), encyclopedic style ("renowned" isn't commonly seen in encyclopedias), but I think it's excellent work for a first article in such a user-unfriendly interface as Wikipedia. Nobody can get the references right without a lot of practice. Acroterion (talk) 01:22, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- By the way, iMDB isn't usable as a source, since, like WP, it's user-generated. It's useful as a guide, but can't be usefully cited. Acroterion (talk) 04:58, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Help request
[edit]This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hi - The page for Kathryn Kates has the notice that it is an orphan. We linked her information to many other pages, but how do we get rid of that status? Is there somewhere I can get a link to Kathryn's page? Thank you. Jnkates (talk) 15:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
- Done. Mdann52 (talk) 16:14, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Steven Lebetkin.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Steven Lebetkin.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:22, 2 September 2017 (UTC)