User talk:Jnk

Please click here to leave me a new message.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Jnk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Dr Debug (Talk) 23:29, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Duke Ellington

I'm afraid we seem to have just collided on this article; I didn't get an edit conflict, but it looks as though my changes overrode yours. I'll go back to the article and try to put your copy-editing back in. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 18:44, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK; I was happy with either version, so yours is fine with me. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 19:16, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AP Psychology

My main problem was not the risk that something similar was offered elsewhere, but that the article did not describe where this was taking place at all, as if North America is the universe. As it was originally, it reminded me of a one-sentence article I saw some time ago that went something like this: "Holy Trinity Church is on the corner of Bledsoe Lane and Tunlaw Drive." By the way, trademarks are not automatically global, and I doubt the College Board applied for a European trademark -- in which case they need to establish that they are actively doing trade under that mark in Europe. --Lambiam ^Talk 22:23, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Koingo spammer

Thanks for your efforts on reverting this person's spam. Reyk _YO! 22:30, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: ER / WP:MOSDAB

<rant>Argh, I wish the MOS: prefix would die. People get to make up whatever random shortcuts they want. I'm going to start creating I: shortcuts to my pages, just for the hell of it.</rant>

Anyway. Sorry about that. :) Yes, ER looks great. I'm not an expert at WP:MOSDAB myself... I think it's hard to do a really really good job... but since like 80% of disambig pages are done totally the opposite of WP:MOSDAB, I think it's hard to focus on really refining them, since there's thousands of pages that still need to be fixed. Anyway, it's good to hear others are picking up WP:MOSDAB. --Interiot 01:31, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, being new to Wikipedia I sometimes wonder why we aren't able to restrict modes of editing pages in various namespaces a little bit better. (Like, can't we make talk pages more like phpBB... why doesn't it know that my post needs to be signed, why can I edit the text of someone else's post on a talk page, or edit the comments on a section that's marked as an archived vote with a decision already rendered. I know it's easy enough to revert the edits, but still...) At the same time I think that it's the total free-form nature of the wiki that makes Wikipedia what it is - on some level I think you can't have the restricted interaction and the free-form collaborative editing at the same time.

Anyway... rant totally understood. I was looking for ER the TV series and I had trouble finding it on the ER dab page at all. After going through all of the edits I think the most important guidelines for a readable disambig page are: one link per line, no piping, and no bolding. Thanks again. —Jnk^[talk] 02:11, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, that's the core of it. Also, generally add a {{wiktionary}} or {{wiktionarypar}} template, and remove dictionary definitions (eg. lines that have zero relevant links) or move them to wiktionary.

For talk pages... *shrug* One thing is that wikis in general have a 10 year long history, and most wiki software is far less complicated than MediaWiki, and wikis have always used a sort of free-form discussion page like this, so that the software can be kept really simple. Also, among the development staff for mediawiki specifically, there's a pervasive idea that... HTML is generally complicated, and it's gentler on new people to just teach them wikitext (which is true), but then the whole making-due-with-simpler-tools thing goes too far, and sometimes I think it would save new people time if the software did more complicated work (with the complex stuff hidden away from view), as that would sometimes simplify things for the end user (such as a different format for talk pages). But the talk pages thing in particular would take a ton of work, and most of mediawiki has been built by free labor so far, so it's a bit hard to complain... --Interiot 02:38, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gartner

Please define consensus. Also, I believe it is the first time that isolated change has been made based on my review of the history files and it has yet to be reverted until you just did it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by IKnowUthink (talk • contribs) 11:08, 10 May 2006 (EDT).

Re: Template:Infobox University

I think you have this the wrong way round: I changed the class from "infobox" to "infobox bordered", a format which is more common among infoboxes and for the most part more attractive. I won't pursue the matter however. Happy editing, --cj | talk 05:01, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wisconsinite

You a wisconsinite like me? :) Tonetare 23:53, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copy & paste did not work

I understand your concern about my recent revision to ExxonMobile. I was trying to correct the word, "larget," which missed an "s." For some reason, all content after the first paragraph was missing from the edit box. I apologize for any inconvenience. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.160.188.210 (talk • contribs) 12:46, 1 June 2006 ET.

Not a problem, I had already restored the content that was accidentally removed. It happens to the best of us, but it's easy to look back in the page history and restore the old version! —Jnk^[talk] 19:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for the trust that you had in me when you supported my Request for Adminship. The nomination ended successfully and I am actually overwhelmed by the support that I received. Thanks again! -- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 07:07, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

city infobox

Hi - Can you please comment on this thread? Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 15:49, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Name

Your name in real life doesnt happen to be Micheal does it?--Gephart 21:50, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Boothy443

Thanks for telling me about Boothy being on a personal attack parole. I wouldn't have known otherwise. I didn't increase the length of the block, but I logged the block here. Cheers. AnnH ♫ 15:31, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Erie

Thanks for fixing the Erie page. I am not yet well-versed on Wiki stuff and it was bothering me that no one else got to it.

The map with the state and the red dot of Erie did not show up. But if I click on the area, it'll open a in a new browser. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bobbycherry2 (talk • contribs) 00:07, 13 June 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Strange that the resized map wouldn't show. I changed the width slightly and now mediawiki is generating the image alright. Maybe tomorrow it will work at 250px again, who knows. I've seen a few other people complaining of auto-image resizing problems lately. —Jnk^[talk] 03:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Map Sizes in Idaho city articles

Ah, that works great. Thanks for your help! --Faustus37 04:11, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template Infobox City

Thanks for putting up that template warning tag on the Template:Infobox_city. I was thinking of adding one myself last night due to all the erroneous edits recently, but couldn't find the right one. Dr. Cash 04:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

infobox formatting

Hi - What do you think of the current template:Infobox Country? I'm working on a simpler alternate, see User:Rick Block/Template:Infobox Country. The primary difference (other than the padding, that I can't quite seem to get worked out - any ideas?) is the length of the horizontal lines between groups of cells. The current version embeds a borderless table in a 1em larger rectangle so these lines are not full width. I think this is fairly stylish looking, but (AFAICT) can't be done as a style for a simple table. Utlimately, I'd like to unify the look of template:Infobox City with the country version as well as the numerous country-specific subdivision infoboxes, like Template:Infobox U.S. state. Consistency across all of these may be too much to ask, but it seems odd to me that there are three very different looking infoboxes for a city and the state/subdivision it's in and the country. Please let me know what you think (and if you know how to fix the padding issue, feel free to fix it in User:Rick Block/Template:Infobox Country). Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 21:37, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Standardized look for geographical infoboxes

Hi - I created a proposed guideline for geographical infoboxes I expect you might be interested in, please see Wikipedia:Geographical infoboxes. -- Rick Block (talk) 00:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

City infobox problem

Hi. I am sorry I use this way but I am not sure which one could be better. With a great pleasure I used the infobox when starting work on my article on city of Příbram, Czech Republic. It however inserted a link next to coordinates that points to a statistical office - source for the number of citizen. I cannot figure out how to repair it. Please help me. The article is Příbram. Thanks, Okino 23:42, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:BlueArcLogo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:BlueArcLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:19, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JonathanTisch.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JonathanTisch.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Y not? 00:40, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BoardwalkLogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BoardwalkLogo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:CityOfAshlandLogo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:CityOfAshlandLogo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:44, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DiamondOffshoreLogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:DiamondOffshoreLogo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:28, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:FalconNwLogo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:FalconNwLogo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:FoundryNetLogo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:FoundryNetLogo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:GulfSouthLogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:GulfSouthLogo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:LoewsHotelsLogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:LoewsHotelsLogo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:TexasGasLogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:TexasGasLogo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:LorillardLogo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:LorillardLogo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 15:41, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LTRBlue.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:LTRBlue.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Image:Ccoilogo.jpg)

You've uploaded Image:Image:Ccoilogo.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

Hello, Jnk. Based on the templates on your talk page, I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia. Note:Keep in mind that Squadron members officially state they are not inclusionists. ~~~~

Non-Free rationale for File:LeonardCarmichaelDrawing.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:LeonardCarmichaelDrawing.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:34, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jnk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jnk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:PAMap-doton-Doylestown.png

The file File:PAMap-doton-Doylestown.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:PAMap-doton-Reading.png

The file File:PAMap-doton-Reading.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:PAMap-doton-Erie.png

The file File:PAMap-doton-Erie.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]