User talk:Jmjglick

April 2007

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to History of Microsoft Windows. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SchmuckyTheCat 04:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as Windows RG. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. NawlinWiki 21:41, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So, articles describing flash animations are not valid? What if someone really wanted to find out more about Windows RG, and they didn't see it here, resorting to Google or some other search web site. Would you want customers using Google when they could be using Wikipedia?--Jmjglick 00:52, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. SchmuckyTheCat 04:00, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]