User talk:Jmismas

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jmismas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My name is Joe Mismas and I have been using this Wikipedia account/name for years. I have no clue who OSUHEY is. This is my only Wikipedia account and I am not sure why I was blocked.

Decline reason:

you are blocked for abuse of multiple accounts, as I believe you know. Let us note that this block was applied in august 2011, and let us also note that the edits you have made come to a grand total of twelve. Sockpuppets are not usually unblocked ever. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:00, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion of Plunderbund

A tag has been placed on Plunderbund requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Carados (talk) 01:06, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Robert Mecklenborg. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 04:27, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jmismas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I sincerely have no idea why I have been blocked. I am a frequent user of Wikipedia and only edit things when I see mistakes or to add additional content to pages about Ohio Politics, a topic with which I am very familiar. I recently tried to edit a grammar mistake on a page and discovered I had been blocked for being a "sockpuppet" - a term I had not heard before being blocked. I can assure you this is my only account and I will gladly do whatever is necessary to get it unblocked. But right now I'm still not even sure why the block was put in place. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.

Decline reason:

You may well be a frequent user of the encyclopedia, and you are welcome to continue to view pages. You are not a frequent editor from this account, which shows only twelve edits plus two unblock requests. You are blocked, for abuse of multiple accounts, by an admin who has checkuser ability. An ordinary admin will not undo a checkuser block. If you wish to appeal, e-mail the blocking admin. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 14:51, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sorry - blocking admin is DeltaQuad. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 14:55, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]