User talk:Jmikkila

Planned Updates to Cuteness Page

1. add section titled 'Physical Aspects' of cuteness 2. update pictures (to cuter ones) 3. add section titled ' Cultural Differences in Cuteness' 4. Include article

Welcome

Hello, Jmikkila and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. We encourage you to read our instructions for students. Your instructor or professor may wish to participate in either the School and University WikiProject or the Global Education Program. The Global Education Program is supported by the Wikimedia Foundation and offers official online and classroom support through the Ambassador Program.

Here are some other pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Helpme}} before the question.

Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.

It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and should be treated accordingly.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:40, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse Invitation

Hello! Jmikkila, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:26, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:The three faces that are perceived cutest in Alley's study of Head Shape and Perceived Cuteness.png)

Thanks for uploading File:The three faces that are perceived cutest in Alley's study of Head Shape and Perceived Cuteness.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:24, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Psych 2410 Assignment - Peer Review assignment - 2012-11-08

1/1 The student has improved the quality of the information available in this article
1/1 The student has improved the clarity and/or organization of the content
1/1 The student has clearly explained the method and findings of an empirical paper
1/1 The student has correctly cited the empirical paper according to Wikipedia guidelines, and the paper is appropriate (i.e., it is an empirical study on development published the results in an academic journal)
Comments and Suggestions for Improvement: I thought your edits to the article were excellent. The Caregiver Correlates to Cuteness and Cultural Significance were very interesting reading!

LannyFisher (talk) 14:24, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review on Fritjof Capra

.5/1 The student has improved the quality of the information available in this article 1/1 The student has improved the clarity and/or organization of the content 1/1 The student has clearly explained the method and findings of an empirical paper 1/1 The student has correctly cited the empirical paper according to Wikipedia guidelines, and the paper is appropriate (i.e., it is an empirical study on development published the results in an academic journal) Comments and Suggestions for Improvement: - “UC Santa Cruz” could also be highlighted to become a link – there is an article on Wiki about this school. - While I did not find much information had been added, what was added was added very well as there was no break in the flow of the article. No one else reading the article would realize that the information posted was new. Coveheadgirl (talk) 14:27, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Education Program: student survey!

Hi! I work with the Wikipedia Education Program, and I'm hoping to get your feedback about your experience this semester! In order to help other students like you enjoy editing while contributing positively to Wikipedia, it would be very helpful to hear from real program students about their experience, so we know what to change. The survey takes no more than 10 minutes, and I'd really appreciate your response!

Thanks so much! JMathewson (WMF) (talk) 20:56, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]