User talk:Jmcgnh/Archives/2020/03

turbovpn.co additions

FYI with regard to the correct message that you left at User talk:HpforTech, you may be interested in the bot report m:User:COIBot/XWiki/turbovpn.co which shows a similar creation a month ago. If it continues to be problematic, please consider a ANI or escalation to checkusers for confirmation of sockpuppetry. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:49, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

tag

Hi, Can the tagging now be removed? Article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_H._Castro_Neto Marilen.buenviaje (talk) 07:07, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Marilen.buenviaje, another editor has removed the paid-coi tag.

I've not seen any other comments on my proposed rewrite of the lede. Replacing the lede is easy enough, but there are some refs and other information that probably need to be pushed down into the body somewhere. I'm still in favor of leaving the advert tag until some more de-promotion edits are done. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:06, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

jmcgnh Is it possible to ask your help to do the de-promotion edits (as you have advised me previously not to edit it directly myself)? I'm fine and it is okay for it to be edited in any way you think it suits the Wikipedia's criteria and policy. Thank you. Marilen.buenviaje (talk) 03:23, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

jmcgnh can I get an update on the tagging placed on my article? thanks.Marilen.buenviaje (talk) 07:40, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for your help. I'm still very new at this and am finding my way.

--Moleppa (talk) 01:57, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

A couple of questions

I don't understand why you removed the list of artists "MOS:SECTIONORDER says references before external links; removed list of artists without source)".

Almost all of them had links to Wikipedia articles. Am I supposed to find an article/review in an outside publication that refers to each exhibition? Or do you want the artists' individual websites?

I have tried to be neutral in my language, but the reason for creating the page is that the gallery is nearly alone in the level of its support for women artists and experimental artists.

I have studied many other Wikipedia gallery articles, and feel that the language and subjects covered in mine are pretty much in line with other existing articles.

As I've said this is my first attempt, and any further advice would be appreciated. --Moleppa (talk) 02:20, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Moleppa, You would need to cite a source to add that list of "artists include" otherwise, where would the information have come from? Existing articles which are not specified as GA - Good article or FA - Featured article have not been through the sort of rigorous review process that would make them worthy of emulation. New articles from new editors usually go through the articles for creation review process as a (relatively new - a couple of years) effort to make sure new articles are better than the run-of-the-mill old article.

Remarking on the level of support for women artists and experimental artists has to be based on published professional reviews that say so; it cannot simply be based on a statement from the gallery owner.

Let's see if other editors pick up on this new article and decide to so something about it...give it at least a week or two before we know what other editors think. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:27, 27 March 2020 (UTC)