User talk:Jmagicvamp

Welcome

Hello, Jmagicvamp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Grey's Anatomy (season 7) have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Frickative 13:54, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

90210

No, it's not. In the press release by The CW (the network that owns and airs the show) she's listed as "Silver" and that's what she described as throughout the show. Over other guidelines... The name that's used the most is preferred, just clarifying that. Jayy008 (talk) 16:33, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One Tree Hill

The CW and Sophia Bush have denied the show's been picked up for a full season. Jayy008 (talk) 09:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

90210 season 3

Diego Boneta isn't billed as either or. He's a guest star. The CW website only lists regulars so there's no way to prove he's simply Javier. Jayy008 (talk) 11:14, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One Tree Hill - Season 8

There's no way to confirm that Sylvia is called Sylvia Baker until she appears in the show. Jayy008 (talk) 01:01, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info! Jayy008 (talk) 17:43, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Hate List

The article The Hate List has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources found to verify film.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 00:01, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Hate List for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article The Hate List, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hate List until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 00:08, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

90210

It is sourced in the cast section. Please read an article and edit summaries before making an edit again when the first one was reverted. Jayy008 (talk) 19:53, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, but that's what the source says. And until a source says he'll be in more, we can't change that. The decision has been reached, an admin put it through 3O and it's done. Please don't move to recurring again. Jayy008 (talk) 17:44, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, just to let you know, we can't make things up. We can't call a character recurring if the source doesn't say it is. Jayy008 (talk) 17:48, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And to answer your question "Do we have solid proof that he'll only appear in one episode?" Yes, the source says 18th episode, that means one. Anything else is speculation and "making things up" if it's recurring Michael Ausiello says it is. Have I answered all of your questions? Jayy008 (talk) 17:58, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See here for a better explained reason why the character belongs in guest star. (Aside from common sense) Jayy008 (talk) 18:29, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can correct me without being rude about it.

I'm sorry but I found your reply to me on the Gossip Girl page rude. I never once said that my opinion is the only one that matters. That's why I brought it up for discussion. That's why I replied rude here, as I found that rude. Jayy008 (talk) 23:36, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Then let's make a deal to not be rude when we come into conflict.

There was no conflict, a discussion page is for discussion. I don't understand the statement "not only your opinion matters" when that's obviously the reason I brought it up for discussion - because others matter. And yes as for your deal I'm never rude first, so yes, I won't be rude in conflicts. Jayy008 (talk) 15:14, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

discussion

Please voice your opinion here Thank you. Jayy008 (talk) 23:42, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello!
I noticed you've made edits to Rihanna articles. I thought you may be interested in joining
Wikipedia:WikiProject Rihanna
Calvin • ^TalkThatTalk 15:13, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Jmagicvamp. You have new messages at Calvin999's talk page.
Message added 19:42, 20 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Calvin • ^TalkThatTalk 19:42, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disaster (song)

Please don't be too quick to threaten other editors with a block--you don't have the power to block an editor, and it is by no means certain that a block would be granted by an admin in this particular case. I agree that the editor needs to stop adding poorly verified and trivial (chatty) stuff, but that's a content matter and definitely not yet vandalism. If you want to make a stronger case if disruption persists, explain yourself to the editor on the article talk page or on their own talk page, so that it is without doubt that disruption is taking place. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:12, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my haste, but with all due respect, I've put alot of work into this article as well as the articles pertaining to the singer and the album from which the single has been derived and this user is consistently adding trivial information, but also does so in a sloppy and grammatically incorrect manner. Please help me find a more productive way to deal with this situation. jmagicvamp (talk) 18:15, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No apology necessary: I'm just telling you what will give you a better chance of success. Tell them (as friendly as you can) what the problem is with their edits or they'll keep on doing it. If you do, and they don't respond or don't change, then you can argue that their edits are disruptive. Good luck, Drmies (talk) 18:21, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where can I bring this up? I've tried to relay that message, but the user hasn't responded. Thanks! jmagicvamp (talk) 18:25, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On Talk:Disaster (song) or on User talk:ClydeG312. I don't think you've posted on either one; if you have, do it again. Administrators will usually only consider something as disruptive if it is made clear to the disruptor that what they're doing is not OK. Good luck trimming the rest of that article. If you've done all that, and they keep at it, you can ask an admin to step in or you can report them at WP:AIV, but either way an admin will have to decide that it is in fact vandalism. (See the definition at WP:VANDALISM.) Drmies (talk) 18:32, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Olivia Pope

Do you intend to add WP:IC WP:RS to Olivia Pope?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:47, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do, I've been trying to edit gradually as I don't have the time to do a complete overhaul of the article all at once. jmagicvamp (talk) 14:11, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Please don't sloppily add bare URLs. Look at the proper WP:IC format that I used for the other citations.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:44, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Olivia Pope, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jeff Perry (actor) and Guillermo Diaz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

JoJo (singer)

Hi, I wanted to ask as to what was exactly was wrong with my recent edits to the JoJo (singer) article? My edit was done in hopes of updating and better representing the article. Seeing as my entire contribution towards the article has been disregarded, its makes my time and effort put into trying to make this a better article a waste. I've put alot of work into this article to ensure that it is updated and correct as often as possible. So if there is actually anything wrong with my edits please tell me why or help me improve it instead of disregarding it completely. Thank you ClydeG312 (talk) 07:00, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The introduction to the article is supposed to be a brief summary leading with the artist's biggest accomplishments and releases. The in-depth information is addressed in the full article and please be sure to edit in such a manner in which spelling and grammar are fully correct before you save your edits. It was not my intention to upset you, but edits must be constructive. jmagicvamp (talk) 18:08, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jmagicvamp. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jmagicvamp. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jmagicvamp. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jmagicvamp. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]