User talk:Jlopez4758/sandbox
Jlopez peer review
[edit]There are some grammatical errors, the headings are not bold, underlined, or separated, and the reference links aren't connected to anything. I feel like that's a technical issue. Other than that, the intro is a good summary, the voice is neutral, there is an attempt at organization (again the separation was off) and the wording is easy to understand.
Response
[edit]Thanks for the response. I was particularly concerned about the neutral voice, so thanks for clearing that up with me. I will look over grammar as I move forward. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlopez4758 (talk • contribs) 04:27, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Jlopez peer review
[edit]There are some grammatical errors, the headings are not bold, underlined, or separated, and the reference links aren't connected to anything. I feel like that's a technical issue. Other than that, the intro is a good summary, the voice is neutral, there is an attempt at organization (again the separation was off) and the wording is easy to understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaximillianSearles (talk • contribs) 20:41, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Response
[edit]Thanks for these cosmetic reviews. I am planning on tightening up these issues as I go along. Organization is a big one with Wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlopez4758 (talk • contribs) 04:28, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Jlopez4758 peer review
[edit]You have a good foundation but some of your paragraphs do not flow due to incomplete sentences. I would suggest combining some of your shorter sentences into one longer sentence. Overall, the articles voice is neutral and covers a wide range of topics relevant to Agnodice. I enjoyed reading your intro, but I recommend adding a few more words about Gaius Julius Hyginus because the sentence is abrupt.Ingridxreyes (talk) 22:20, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
response
[edit]I appreciate your collegiality. This is the second time I've gotten feedback on neutrality. I'm glad for the reassurance. I'll check over the mentioned discrepancies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlopez4758 (talk • contribs) 04:30, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Jlopez4758 peer review
[edit]You have a great start to your article it was a very interesting. I was suggest shorting some sentences other then that it is good so far! I wish I knew enough about the topic to comment and further. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asdf12356 (talk • contribs) 03:20, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Polishing my work
[edit]To polish my work, I've been editing the content I've added and even added more of it directly into the Wikipedia page I'm working on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlopez4758 (talk • contribs) 20:06, 30 November 2018 (UTC)