User talk:Jlopardo

Welcome!

Hello, Jlopardo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sterling Smartware Solutions, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! DanielRigal (talk) 20:27, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sterling Smartware Solutions

The article Sterling Smartware Solutions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The alleged reference doesn't even contain the alleged word "smartware" and is about a completely different company? Is this a hoax?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanielRigal (talk) 20:27, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Smartware

The article Smartware has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that this neologism is notable. References do not seem to support the alleged word "smartware". Also seems to be a promotional essay rather than an encyclopaedia article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanielRigal (talk) 20:30, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Medical device smartware

The article Medical device smartware has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that this neologism is notable. References do not seem to support the alleged word "smartware". Also seems to be a promotional essay rather than an encyclopaedia article. Also pretty much identical to the article at smartware, which I am also PRODding.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanielRigal (talk) 20:31, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Hello Jlopardo. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 21:09, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Smartware for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Smartware is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smartware until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DanielRigal (talk) 20:51, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sterling Smartware Solutions

A tag has been placed on Sterling Smartware Solutions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. DanielRigal (talk) 19:31, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: The article was deleted because it was a copyright violation with the content copied directly from the website of the company that you work for. It was also clearly promotional in tone. Due to the copyright violation, it was deleted immediately and I will not restore it. You may ask for a review of the deletion through the Deletion Review process. You can also recreate the article without the copyright violations and without the promotional tone. Before you do so, I strongly recommend that you review Wikipedia's Business' FAQ. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:18, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re your messasge: Your company holds the copyright to all of the content on their web pages. Just because you included a reference to your company's website does not grant the right to copy the content into Wikipedia. I recommend that you review Wikipedia's Copyright FAQ. Since the vast majority of the article was copied directly from your company's website, I can not restore or give you a copy of the article because I would be restoring a copyright violation which is now allowed on Wikipedia. I strongly suggest that you review the two FAQs that I give you before you continue to edit: Business' FAQ, specifically What materials can I upload? and Copyright FAQ. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:05, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]