User talk:Jlhiowa

Just a friendly note about CCDI. Instead of deleting the article, I reverted back to the version about a different company that asserts notability (publicly traded). If you think that version needs to go as well, AfD would be the way to go. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:47, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Potential Edit War at Der Hexenkreis‎

Please comment at Talk:Der_Hexenkreis#Alumni_Section before continuing to edit the article. Thanks! Ndenison ^talk 05:16, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting timing! I finished writing on the Talk:Der_Hexenkreis and was notified I had a new message--this one. I will make sure to use the Discussion Page before any more tags/reverts/edits.

Would it be possible to lock/freeze the article from any edits until there is some usage of the Discussion Page? Jlhiowa (talk) 05:28, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It would be, but would require an admin and really isn't necessary. There would be other routes. If he refuses to respond, then a consensus will be reached without him and his edits could constitute vandalism. Hopefully it won't come to that. Ndenison ^talk 05:35, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Frederick Ayer

I have declined to delete this speedily as the article does assert significance. He was the founder of an important textile company, American Woolen Company. One of his homes, Frederick Ayer Mansion is a National Historic Landmark because of its connection with him. An article need not assert having coverage in third party sources. However, Google Book and Google web hits are surprisingly numerous for a man dead 90 years, so coverage by third party sources seems significant enough for a discussion at WP:AFD, instead of via speedy deletion. Cheers, Dloh cierekim 17:15, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Student Venture speedy deletion declined

Asserts significance via reach and membership. Google Web and Google Book hits may be sufficient to provide WP:RS. Cheers, Dloh cierekim 17:24, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re:tag on Southwest Suburban Conference

Hiya Jlhiowa!

In January 2009, you placed a notability tag on this article. I have since begun the process of cleaning this up. I think that there is a case for an assertion of notability at this point, but I am generally reluctant to remove tags like this until after I have contacted the editor who originally placed them. If you care to check this and let me know, I will be happy to remove the tag, or discuss what would be needed to ease your doubts. Have a great day! LonelyBeacon (talk) 05:53, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Jlhiowa,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]