User talk:Jlhc

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Hynca-Hooley 23:37, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Enterobacteria phage T4, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have identified as vandalism can be found here: link. If you believe this edit is not vandalism, please contact me. AmiDaniel (Talk) 04:23, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I might just not understand what you were attempting to say, but I still believe the edit in question to be vandalism. If you could point me to a specific source, rephrase your statement, or begin a discussion with other editors via the article's talk page to better articulate your point, however, I might reconsider my decision. I apologize if your edit really is intended to be a constructive contribution, but it does not appear so to me. In the future, using edit summaries might help explain the changes you make and prevent your edits from being flagged as vandalism and reverted. If you truly do believe that this edit is not vandalism, please don't hesitiate to contact me or an admin to further debate the matter. AmiDaniel (Talk) 06:30, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

After looking over your source and conferring with a few admins and members of the CVU, I've arrived back at my original decision regarding the edit. The article Enterobacteria phage T4 is intended to be a serious scientific article about an actual virus; replacing its content with jokes and other nonsense (no matter how well sourced) is a form of unconstructive vandalism. While there is evidence to suggest that you made this edit in good faith, you nonetheless need to be aware that such contributions are not tolerated and could result in your being blocked from editing if you continue in such fashion. That being said, I do not want to discourage you from participating on Wikipedia, and if you would like to contribute positively to our encyclopedia, please check out the welcome page. I apologize for any incovenience, and if you have any questions, feel free to ask me. AmiDaniel (Talk) 00:59, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Super Toad

I deleted the article Super Toad because it was proposed for deletion on April 10 2006 and the nomination was not contested. I have restored the text of the article to User:Jlhc/Super Toad, which is inside your Wikipedia userspace. If you wish, you can move it back to Super Toad, but because it does not meet Wikipedia's web site notability guidelines, it will almost certainly be nominated for deletion again. You may want to consider putting it on Comixpedia, which is very similar to Wikipedia, except it is entirely dedicated to webcomics. –Abe Dashiell ^(t/c) 18:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not so much that the article itself doesn't meet our requirements. It's the subject material. Before we include an article on a webcomic, it must have achieved some level of recognition. We have guidelines broadly spelled out in WP:WEB. This is why I strongly recommend Comixpedia instead of Wikipedia. Comixpedia doesn't have the same requirements. You can create an account for it here. You can probably even use the same Jlhc name. Once you're logged in to Comixpedia, go here and copy the content of the Super Toad article. Then go here, paste it in, save it, and it'll be on Comixpedia. –Abe Dashiell ^(t/c) 02:23, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]