User talk:Jlee4444

Speedy deletion nomination of Joseph Potaskie

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Joseph Potaskie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Anoldtreeok (talk) 07:08, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've posted the hang on tag. By all means state your case on the talk page, you have references so it's not impossible to defend the article. I recommend finding additional sources, other articles that can link to it, and try and explain why this person is notable. The article explains what his notability, but whether being the first jewish pole in Australia is notable should be stated. However, another editor can remove the tag at anytime if they don't believe it fits the criteria for speedy deletion, so good luck. Anoldtreeok (talk) 08:20, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with Joseph Potaskie

Hi,

If have tagged the above article with multiple issues. You appear to be the creator and most significant contributor to the article. I have given some suggestions on how you could proceed with improving the article until it meets the standards required of Wikipedia articles. User:Ian3280 appears keen to assist in improving the article. Note that the concerns I have are fairly serious and warrant deletion of the article unless some things are clarified and changes are made fairly soon. If you have further questions please ask at my talk page. Remember to sign your talk page contributions with ~~~~ and to fill out the edit summary box for each edit, especially on articles. Thanks. Bleakcomb (talk) 05:23, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joseph Potaski for deletion

The article Joseph Potaski is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Potaski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bleakcomb (talk) 12:09, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]