User talk:Jlcruse430

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Bubduction, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Taggard (Complain) 04:15, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Butt runger) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Flyguy649^talk_contribs 04:19, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bubduction

A tag has been placed on Bubduction, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -WarthogDemon 01:39, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Strong tower communcications

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Strong tower communcications, by RHaworth (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Strong tower communcications seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Strong tower communcications, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:12, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Cruse brother's production

A tag has been placed on Cruse brother's production requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NeilN 03:45, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Cruse brother's production, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. --NeilN 03:46, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr. Cruse: I am in receipt of your recent note, which among other things says:

"How would you like it if you worked all day on a page then somone you dont even know comes along, has no idea what the information is or that it might be useful for someone and just deletes it? You better respond with some good answers."

You may come back and talk to me about this -- considerably more politely -- when you have read and understood the material at this link: Wikipedia: Why was my article deleted?. No one here has to respond to you for any reason, and good manners are much more likely to get you information that you apparently need.

"I now have no desire to retry and in fact will probably never visit again." In that case, you probably won't read this but, if you do, I have two points for you to consider: (1) I am delighted to hear that I will not be put to the trouble of deleting your next unsuitable article, and (2) if you're trying to look sufficiently grown-up to be in Wikipedia, then it would help if the name of your "company" was spelled correctly. The apostrophe goes after the "s" in "Brothers", not after the "r". Accounting4Taste 15:45, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr. Cruse: Thanks for your note; no apology is necessary, but it was appreciated. Administrators have to have a very thick skin if they choose the work of "new page patrol", and since my next-to-most-recent note was from someone who called me a "fat Canadian Nazi fag", it was relatively easy to respond to your message without much acrimony. I am happy to learn that you have chosen to work within Wikipedia's policy boundaries and I welcome your further contributions -- if I can be of further assistance, please just leave me a note on my talk page. Below this message, I will put a standard "welcome" message which contains links to some Wikipedia policies and procedures that you may find worthwhile, and that will guide you in the creation of an article should you wish to do so. I look forward to seeing you around the encyclopedia. (And thanks for moving the apostrophe -- I appreciate it.) Accounting4Taste 23:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Jlcruse430, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Accounting4Taste 23:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Crusebroslogo.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Crusebroslogo.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 22:07, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]