User talk:Jlbgiles

Welcome from Sphilbrick

Welcome, Jlbgiles! Welcome! Hello, Jlbgiles, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Sphilbrick, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Here are a few good links for newcomers: Introduction The Five Pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help How to write a great article Manual of Style Thank you for your contributions to wikipedia, it has helped make wikipedia a better encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! SPhilbrickT 21:55, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Unfortunately, despite the work you put into it

See WP:NEO--SPhilbrickT 21:56, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Edultery

The article Edultery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unencyclopedic Content - WP:DICTIONARY

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:11, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Edultery

I appreciate that you have created this page, but I'm afraid that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, per WP:DICTIONARY. You can, however, put it in Wiktionary instead/ --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Eslut for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eslut is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eslut until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ryan Vesey (talk) 17:37, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Edultery for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edultery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edultery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ryan Vesey (talk) 17:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Edultery

The article Edultery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Contested PROD. A fairly obvious breach of WP:DICTIONARY and possible breach of WP:HOAX. The Oxford English Dictionary reference can only be opened with a subscription and checks of other dictionary sites found that the word did not exist

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:42, 13 July 2011 (UTC)