User talk:Jlawniczak

{{helpme}} Hello, I am new to Wikipedia and so haven't figured out all that much yet. I have had very little content with the community. I just reverted vandalism to the Chick Lit article. I went to the talk page of that user and see numerous other warnings about vandalism -- quite a few (user talk 72.23.40.23). It seems to me that this user has been warned repeatedly about vandalism, yet continues. I'd recommend that the block that has been threatened now be enforced. How do I make that recommendation? Thanks, Jlawniczak (talk) 21:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported this user to WP:AIV, the page for admin intervention against vandalism. This is probably where you should go to report a user who has been repeatedly vandalising. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 21:37, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- By the way, Stwalkerster (talk · contribs) has blocked the IP in question. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 21:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick help, I appreciate it Jlawniczak (talk) 23:21, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Hello, I am new to Wikipedia so I don't know how to deal with the Frank Terreri article, but it seems to me to be horribly inappropriate, for reasons that others have stated (news story not encyclopeida entry) but also in particular in that it contains unsupported argument taking sides in a dispute: "the Department of Homeland Security infringe on Terreri's right to free expression, they actually jeopardized the public's safety by limiting the speech of whistleblowers. Terreri and all other FAMs were prohibited from participating in informative debate about the safety of the airline industry." The article is essentially the plaintiff's complaint in the litigation and written as if all those allegations are true. This has been tagged for over a year and a half, yet is still here. It would be my recommendation that this one sided position be deleted immediately. What can be done to effect that? Jlawniczak (talk) 02:34, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can nominate it for deletion with that very reason. That link gives you instructions on how to do so. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:39, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help, it's very complication, not sure I did it all right -- mine didn't seem to come out the same on the log, I tried twice and followed the directions religiously; anyway now it's up to others, but this article really should go Jlawniczak (talk) 02:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]