User talk:Jlarsgard

A tag has been placed on Dr Trond Stokke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rudget.talk 15:31, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Dr Trond Stokke

A tag has been placed on Dr Trond Stokke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-Me^MyEars_MyMouth-timed 14:23, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Dr Trond Stokke. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. A^RendedWinter 14:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

A tag has been placed on Dr. Stokke, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

wikified article is Trond Stokke

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tirkfl (talk) 10:20, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article : Pulsed radiofrequency

Good article on this medical procedure, but please don't just paste old article formats over the top of wikified version. Article cleanup is a common and on-going event, but simply putting old content over the top creates a lot more work for editors as things need to be re-done. A^RendedWinter 15:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notes about Trond Stokke

Please do not insert notes into the article on Trond Stokke without formatting them for invisibility. They leave the appearance of vandalism. Comments and discussion about this article go on the talk page for it, Talk:Trond Stokke. I have tried to help you clean up this article, but you need to do a lot of work here, not least in learning how to format articles properly for the English-language Wikipedia. (Have you edited at all on the Norwegian, Esperanto or other Wikipedias?) --Orange Mike | Talk 16:06, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DON'T SHOUT! :) Also: when posting comments, sign with four tildes ~~~~ thus. If you have more to add later, put it below everything else on the page, and sign the new comment separately, thus preserving the thread of the discussion. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New stuff goes on the bottom of the page. Indent for clarity: each new colon at the start of a new paragraph, indents another level. This comment has two colons at the start, so is indented two levels. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:41, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Titles and honorifics

Titles such as Dr., Prof., Rev., Mrs. and the like are not part of an article's title. Do not insert them into existing or newly-created article titles. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:39, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Prof. Menno Sluijter. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Ariel♥Gold 21:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I must have pressed a wrong button or something to that effect. Sorry

also

not even in the case of medical doctors, oops. well im learning something new every day,

i thought i made something invisible with blah

doesnt seem to work though. If i have made mistakes they are certainly not to annoy anyone

I am particularly interested in having access to objective information on interventional

therapies for chronic pain as i know this affects a number of people. Worldwide inadequate treatment

of pain was recently featured in a new york times article. Awareness on this subject brought forth in a

forum like this one where everyone can edit and it is for non commercial purposes could help many people

find information on treatments that isnt followed by and then pay with visa or mastercard as you leave my

clinic.

Speedy deletion nomination of Interventional pain treatments

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Interventional pain treatments requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.

Nomination of Trond Stokke for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trond Stokke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trond Stokke until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Proposed deletion of Interventional pain treatments

The article Interventional pain treatments has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced since 2007; appears to be an essay or opinion piece, basically original research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MelanieN (talk) 20:30, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of World Institute of Pain

The article World Institute of Pain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable article. No sources; fails WP:V, WP:RS. Also borderline advertisement.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 23:39, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of World Institute of Pain for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Institute of Pain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Institute of Pain until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of World Institute of Pain for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Institute of Pain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Institute of Pain (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alexbrn (talk) 12:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]