User talk:Jlandan87
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Social Media Applications for Higher Education (Alumni), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please stop cutting and pasting from other sites to Wikipedia. Also, please see WP:NOR. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:21, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
The article Social Media Applications for Higher Education(Alumni) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Appears to be original research
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ttonyb (talk) 04:40, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Your addition to Social Media Applications for Higher Education(Alumni has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
February 2010
[edit] This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Social Media Applications for Higher Education(Alumni), you will be blocked from editing. Stop adding copyrighted material to Wikipedia, if you continue you will be banned from editing and creating articles. ttonyb (talk) 17:23, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
And please review WP:YFA and WP:NOR. Thank you. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:44, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]
|
Your name has been in mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yentyng for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ttonyb (talk) 06:18, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
The article Literature Review - Social Media Applications for Higher Education has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 01:21, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Literature Review - Social Media Applications for Higher Education
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Literature Review - Social Media Applications for Higher Education requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb (talk) 01:24, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY (TALK) 03:14, 26 February 2010 (UTC)