User talk:Jknepfle

Welcome!

Hello, Jknepfle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Rklawton 16:43, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. —C.Fred (talk) 03:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BabyFit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as BabyFit, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://babyfit.sparkpeople.com/about-us.asp. As a copyright violation, BabyFit appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. BabyFit has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:BabyFit. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at BabyFit, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. -- Merope ^Talk 20:53, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sparkpeople

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Sparkpeople, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://sparkpeople.com/about/index.asp. As a copyright violation, Sparkpeople appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Sparkpeople has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Sparkpeople. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Sparkpeople, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. -- Merope ^Talk 20:54, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BabyFit and SparkPeople

I see on the talk page for BabyFit that you are an employee of the corporation involved and thus have permission to reproduce the text on the company website. However, the articles as they currently stand are advertisements, which is against Wikipedia policy. If you can recreate the article using reliable sources, they might qualify for inclusion. -- Merope ^Talk 18:35, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with the article is that it does not meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion for websites. Has SparkPeople been mentioned in published sources (excluding press releases)? If so, you'll want to edit that in. (Also, as an aside: we don't sign articles we submit--we just do that for talk pages.) I hope I don't sound too harsh; it's really hard for newcomers such as yourself to know all the policies for inclusion. I'll do my best to help. -- Merope ^Talk 18:57, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It looks good. It'll need to be wikified, but I can do that. -- Merope ^Talk 19:31, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of SparkPeople

A tag has been placed on SparkPeople, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g11.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. – ornis ⚙ 16:02, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do believe this was placed in error and have added the {{hangon}} tag. Please let me know what to do from here...Jknepfle 16:13, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a note on the talk page justifying why it shouldn't be deleted. – ornis ⚙ 16:17, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have done so. I am simply trying to write an encylopedic entry for the company SparkPeople, Inc. which runs one of the most visited and highest traffic diet and health sites (per Hitwise and BusinessWeek) as cited in the article. The way I understand it, simply having a site for a company does not violate any guidelines ("Note that simply having a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion. ").Jknepfle 16:20, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You'll also note the discussion I had with the original version of this page with Merope, which was resolved. Then, the article was deleted after nearly a year of being on Wikipedia.Jknepfle 16:24, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just doing my Wikipedia job. There are assertions and proof of notability in the article (Business Week). Contrary to the repost and edit summary, I do have the right to remove the template and will do it again. If a subject is notable enough to probably survive AfD, then it obviously shouldn't be speedied. Smashville 16:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SparkpeopleLogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SparkpeopleLogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Potential conflict of interest related to SparkPeople

Since it seem you may be an employee of SparkPeople, I recommend that you read some of the guidelines below. Deli nk (talk) 18:54, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jknepfle. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Deli nk (talk) 18:54, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]