User talk:Jkirks

Jimmy McNatt

I noticed your contributions to Jimmy McNatt. You seem fairly new at Wikipedia, so I thought I'd share a few tips/let you know about some WP conventions based on your edits.

In the "DEFAULTSORT" meta markup at the bottom, of the page you changed it from "Macnatt, Jimmy" to "Mcnatt, Jimmy" ([1]). It's actually supposed to remain Macnatt for sorting purposes, because people with "McX"-styled last names need to alphabetically show up at the beginning of the M section in its respective categories, not the middle. This adoption of using "Macnatt", for example, happened about a year ago, so it's actually correct as is.
This edit in which you changed his nationality field from [[United States|American]] to {{USA}} is not correct per WP:MOSFLAG, which states (among other things), "Avoid flag icons in infoboxes". Putting a country's flag in an infobox for nationality purposes lends undue weight toward that person's nationality. Ultimately, the link to American that you removed is what's actually correct to use, not the flag.
Hoopedia is not a reliable source to add as a reference. It's another basketball-specific wiki that anyone with a registered account can edit, so its content cannot be trusted (one of the biggest ironies of Wikipedia is that it requires reliable sources for its articles, yet in itself is not considered a reliable source...same goes for Hoopedia, which as far as I can tell rarely, if ever, gets referenced).

I've reverted the above edits, but let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! Jrcla2 (talk) 15:41, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it's nice to have some input from a Wikipedia expert (a first for me). Your edits are duly noted. Can you help me with one new page? I'm trying to create a template using the same structure as the one currently at the bottom of the Jimmy McNatt page (1943 AAU All-America Team). Do you know how to do this? Thanks! Jkirks (talk)

Invitation to take part in a study

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to Main Study. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates about 20 minutes. I chose you as a English Wikipedia user who made edits recently through the RecentChange page. Refer to the first page in the online survey form for more information on the study and me.cooldenny (talk) 03:49, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Undoing edits

Will you please stop flippantly undoing edits solely because you don't know what the edit in question was? It's uncalled for. Jrcla2 (talk) 14:28, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join Stanford's WIkiProject!

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject Stanford University, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Stanford University. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

ralphamale (talk) 22:01, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Danny Miles.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 15:48, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Danny Miles concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Danny Miles, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:14, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Danny Miles

Hello Jkirks. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Danny Miles".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Danny Miles}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 08:00, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]