User talk:Jkiralla

Sea Ranch

Do you have a reference to verify the info you added to the Sea Ranch, California article in this edit? If so, please add it to the article, or if you prefer you can point me to it and I can add it for you. If a reliable source cannot be found, the information will need to be removed until it can be verified. Thanks, --Jezebel'sPonyo ^shhh 16:32, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Loyola Marymount University updates

I agree with your comment about verifiable more than correct, but you discounted the footnote references that I referenced in the updates. I will insert my edits one by one this time to make the verified sources more self-evident. Thanks.

--Jkiralla (talk) 18:04, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hi. Please divulge if you have a conflict of interest. Your edits have been to the article about LMU, the articles about the current and former presidents of that school, and the article about so-called Silicon Beach where the school is located. Taken together, it looks like you don't desire to help us create an encyclopedia but rather you seem to abuse Wikipedia in the service of crass marketing. You are required by terms of service to admit your connection to these entities. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:21, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct on my edits and interest areas, but no conflict exists. I am active in this community, have friends and family members in the area who keep me connected with this institution and local happenings, am an alumnus (but not an employee myself), and think that accurate and verifiable information benefits all users. I appreciate staying focused on collaboration in the best spirit of Wikipedia. Thanks for asking. --Jkiralla (talk) 18:28, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Please don't edit war on Loyola Marymount University per WP:EW. Also, per WP:BRD you should discuss your issues on the article's talk page. If you continue trying to restore your version or add content against consensus, you could be blocked. If you just want to improve the article, a discussion can only help. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:33, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I never intend to get involved in an edit war or have an agenda other than what I already stated. I think the talk page idea is a good one and will make use of it. Jkiralla (talk) 18:41, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]