User talk:JkMastru

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, JkMastru! Thank you for your contributions. I am HiLo48 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HiLo48 (talk) 05:44, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Moxy 🍁 00:35, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No need to get blocked

Behind the scenes of Wikipedia articles, there is a large community of volunteer editors working to build the encyclopedia. It is not uncommon for editors to disagree about the way forward. That is when discussion and attempts to reach consensus should take place. Every article on Wikipedia has a talk page, reached by clicking the Talk tab just above the title (for example, Talk:Evolution). There, editors can discuss improvements to the content of an article. You can participate too! If you ever make a change that gets reverted by another editor, discuss the change on the talk page! The BOLD, revert, discuss cycle is a popular method of reaching consensus and may be useful for identifying objections, keeping discussion moving forward and helping to break deadlocks.

Edit warring (repeatedly overriding or reimplementing contributions) is highly discouraged. There is a bright-line rule called the three-revert rule, the violation of which may lead someone to be blocked from editing to prevent further disruptions.

Puebla

Why are you changing the article name? This needs to be discussed first. I, for one, don't approve of this change. Bkatcher (talk) 02:30, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

When your block has expired, discuss the matter at Talk: United States. Do not try to repeatedly change the article to your personal preference without first gaining consensus on the talk page. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:19, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your repeated moves of Puebla (city) resulted in some of our bots fixing many double redirects, then refixing them, and then refixing them again. This has resulted in some unnecessary page deletions. Please discuss proposed page moves FIRST on the article talk page or at Requested moves. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:03, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cullen328: editor back from block re-implementing edits that others have already reverted with zero effort to communicate with us. Editor simply not here.--Moxy 🍁 05:12, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moxy, please see the section below. Thanks for the notification. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:44, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You have been blocked for one week from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Communicating and collaborating are required. You are doing neither. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:41, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cullen328: Unfortunately, it immediatly goes on and on. –Austronesier (talk) 19:54, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Mexico. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Shellwood (talk) 19:54, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Continued edit warring, for example at Mexico, and move warring, for instance at Muisca. It looks like the previous warnings and blocks have had no effect. If you had any intention of following Wikipedia policies you would have given some evidence of it by now. EdJohnston (talk) 20:07, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Other admins commented on this block at WP:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1014#User: Shellwood and at User talk:Cullen328. EdJohnston (talk) 15:51, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]