User talk:Jjttannn

February 2018

The sandbox page which you created has been deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. There were two reasons for this. Firstly, the page was unambiguously promotional, which is not permitted by Wikipedia policy. Secondly, it is almost never suitable to copy content from another web site to Wikipedia, for more than one reason, the most important being copyright. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. It is very rare that the owner of a web site licenses content for such very free reuse, and in those few occasions when they do so, we require proof of the fact. We don't assume that content is freely licensed on the unsubstantiated say so of just anyone who comes along and creates a Wikipedia account. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:39, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Du Tianqi (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No citations to verify this content. Also, the content reads too much like an advertisement for this performer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Du Tianqi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Du Tianqi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:32, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jjttannn! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:32, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional editing and copyright

When I posted my message above, I had not noticed that you had created another copy of the same page, with the same problems. You, however, must have known that you had posted the same content to both pages, and yet you made no attempt to address the issues I told you about in the second copy. Please make sure that you take note of what I said in any future editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:08, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Du Tianqi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Du Tianqi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:15, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jjttannn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. Place any further information here. Jjttannn (talk) 04:59, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm afraid we can't do anything about a block on an IP address unless you tell us what IP address it is. Please post a new unblock request giving us that information, which will be given in the message you see when you try to edit. Alternatively, if for any reason you prefer not to make your IP address publicly visible, you can request an unblock through the Unblock Ticket Request System. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:12, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You no doubt came to Wikipedia honestly thinking that it would be acceptable to post a copy of promotional content from the web site of the person you were writing about. However, you were told clearly that it isn't acceptable, and yet you have continued to post the same content. You may be blocked from editing if you continue to edit in ways which infringe Wikipedia's policies on copyright and promotion. Also, please don't keep creating multiple copies of the same page. I don't know what your intention in doing so is, but it serves no useful purpose.

You may think that the person you have edited about is "one of the most promising young pianists in China", that he has "outstanding performing skills", and so on and so on, but Wikipedia is not the place to post such promotional text.

Finally, if you have any personal or professional connection to the subject you are writing about, you should read Wikipedia's guideline on conflict of interest, and if your editing forms all or part of work for which you are paid, then you must state who is paying you and what your relationship to them is. (Whether they may be your employer, your client, or anything else.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:10, 5 March 2018 (UTC) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:10, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 20:24, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]