User talk:Jjk82

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Hello, Jjk82, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -Razorflame (talk) 05:12, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your vandalism

This is your only warning. The next time you make a vandalism on the Korea article, you will be blocked for disruption. You seem to be very interested in dog meat and environment of South Korea, why don't you directly go to the articles and contribute to them with verifiable sources? Besides, your mere copy and paste don't help Korean related articles. Please refrain from doing disruptive behaviors. --Appletrees (talk) 21:03, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to South Korea, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Bfigura ^(talk) 21:43, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your massive vandalism

After checking out on your contribution history, you did also a series of disruptive edits on these articles below. Just stop the disruption. --Appletrees (talk) 21:54, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

chauvinism

Jjk82, I have no idea what exactly you are intending for your series of malicious acts on many South Korea-related articles. Most important message I'd like to raise to you is all of your claims derived from the references you used are not pertinent, and forcibly concluded with your own prejudiced, distorted, and personal opinion toward South Korea.

You remind me of the person named, Kuroda, who is a far-right Japanese journalist who resides in Seoul, Korea, and write anti-Korean articles all the time through his lifetime.

Do you think your acts are benevolent to your own country? Do you consider your misconducts are patriotic and heroic acts to your country?

Stop doing vandalism. You have done far more than enough, already.Patriotmissile (talk) 01:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

South Korea

Your edits appear disruptive and appear to introduce information from an unrelaible source. Please stop, or you may be blocked form editing. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 02:33, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

South Korea edit warring

You appear to be engaged in an edit war. According to the Wikipedia:Three-revert rule, this can lead to blocking. Please discuss the changes on the talk page and seek a consensus with other editors before re-introducing this information. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 02:59, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Nice to meet you, I thought I should be friendly to you, because these other editors don't seem to be so friendly towards you. Anyway nice to meet you, and if there is anything I can help you with, please message me.. Take care Sennen goroshi (talk) 12:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Vandalism_and_incivility

Hello Jjk82. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue that you may be involved with. You are free to comment at the discussion, but please remember to keep your comments within the bounds of the civility and "no personal attack" policies. Thank you.

--Appletrees (talk) 14:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

play fair

Don't edit the dudes user page, that's his. Sennen goroshi (talk) 16:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for arbitration

A request for arbitration has been placed at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Korean cuisine. The arbitration involves not only the issues with Korean cuisine but the issues with editing the article South Korea and the civility of multiple editors.--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC (talk) 07:30, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aranherunar's thinking

I, a neutral contributor, have removed all vandalism warnings on your talk page after reviewing most of your edits. I believe the dispute in question is a content dispute and has nothing, nothing at all to do with vandalism. Those who put these obviously improper warnings on your page in bad faith will be notified. As for you, please try not to continously reverting an edit on a page. Proper discussion in good faith, however bad-faithed other editors are, is what will eventually get the work done. Cheers~ Aran|heru|nar 06:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will agree, but you should realize that comments like this ("If they have a negative tone to it, don't blame me, blame those organizations for beening anti-Korean.") are not helping. Your writing tone is also not encyclopedic and not of a neutral point of view. It is one thing to say that the "Koreas view foreigners at best as suspicious and at worst as guilty of ruining their country" (which you are citing from joongangdaily, not one of those sources you said you were using) and another to say that "Koreans are suspicious of foreigners and have strong tradition feelings about their culture." -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:08, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Jjk82 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Appletrees (talk) 12:17, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked you for 24h for your continued aggressive behaviour, POV-pushing and edit warring on South Korea and related topics. Seeing the many warnings above, it must have been clear to you that your edits were disruptive. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:41, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Jjk82 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

123.109.225.162 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Jjk82". The reason given for Jjk82's block is: "Abusing sock puppet accounts: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jjk82".

Blocking administrator: Rlevse (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. nat.utoronto 03:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kimchi

Kimchi does not cause stomach cancer and I would know as I am South Korean.Euge246 (talk) 06:53, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]