User talk:Jitumoni1995

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jitumoni1995. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! KGirlTrucker81^{talk what I'm been doing} 17:00, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pooja Hegde

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KhaasBanda (talk • contribs) 06:06, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Pooja Hegde. Thank you. Tabercil (talk) 16:06, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Ferreira

Please do not add defamatory content that violates our policy on biographies of living people. This is not acceptable. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:48, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Ferreira

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Michael Ferreira, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Qnet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Labe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Qnet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jitumoni1995. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on QNet; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:56, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your edits may be acceptable. Some of them are clearly unacceptable per Wikipedia policy. It's not practical to tease them out, so I've reverted your edits wholesale.

What I suggest is that you request edits, one at a time, on the article's talk page. Be specific about what you want to change and what source backs up the claims. If other editors agree, we can assist you with changing the article, but you should not change the article until you get that consensus. —C.Fred (talk) 17:09, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And for reference, this is a prime example of text that should not be written in Wikipedia's voice. —C.Fred (talk) 18:36, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 17:52, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]