User talk:Jionpedia/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Jionpedia. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Welcome!
|
Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.
Click here to be taken to the survey site.
The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next visit to the Teahouse!
Happy editing,
J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:55, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Message sent with Global message delivery.
Re:Kahaani
I have not gone through the article in details for several days. So, I am not aware of spelling mistakes. Please correct them if you find them; I will also do so. Any other way of help? Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:42, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, that was an excellent overall edit for Kahaani. You picked up so many spelling and other mistrakes. Wow! great.--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:16, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- You are welcome. You are doing awesome editing. Keep it up! Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:58, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Pleasant1623! What you have stated is tight, Sujoy Ghosh hasn't confirmed that there would be a sequel to Kahaani. But that's what the section speaks. The word "possible section" sounds original researched. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 11:04, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah! Tell me..... Will be pleasure to help you out :) -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 14:03, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
- Kahaani still requires quite a work to be done in references. Other than that, it looks GA. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 06:33, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- As Karthik has told, the article looks pretty good, but needs some work with reference, and may be some additionl material particularly to "Production" section. There is no problem as such. Karthik and I had a sort of minor jhagra :) over the reference styling. This happens sometimes. The article should be ok soon.--Dwaipayan (talk) 17:33, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Dwaipayanc, that wasn't a jhagra:) Always stay calm, that's the reason I'm still part of Wikipedia. You can ask me anything, clarify anything with me, anytime. Instead, I felt great of you that you picked up the issue and you started helping me instead of asking me. I will start working on references after few days only now, owing to my exams. TC! -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 17:48, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- Haha! Sorry for using the term jhagra! Yes, staying calm is vital. This happens (difference of opinion) very often in different spheres of life, and in wikipedia. Indeed, this is needed, this actually leads to development of article! Anyway, we will have to decide on certain issues as discussed in the talk page of Kahaani.--Dwaipayan (talk) 17:55, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Dwaipayanc, that wasn't a jhagra:) Always stay calm, that's the reason I'm still part of Wikipedia. You can ask me anything, clarify anything with me, anytime. Instead, I felt great of you that you picked up the issue and you started helping me instead of asking me. I will start working on references after few days only now, owing to my exams. TC! -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 17:48, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- As Karthik has told, the article looks pretty good, but needs some work with reference, and may be some additionl material particularly to "Production" section. There is no problem as such. Karthik and I had a sort of minor jhagra :) over the reference styling. This happens sometimes. The article should be ok soon.--Dwaipayan (talk) 17:33, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- Kahaani still requires quite a work to be done in references. Other than that, it looks GA. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 06:33, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah! Tell me..... Will be pleasure to help you out :) -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 14:03, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Pleasant1623! What you have stated is tight, Sujoy Ghosh hasn't confirmed that there would be a sequel to Kahaani. But that's what the section speaks. The word "possible section" sounds original researched. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 11:04, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- You are welcome. You are doing awesome editing. Keep it up! Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:58, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Re:
Firstly:(Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four keyboard tildes like this: ~~~~
. Or, you can use the [ reply ] button, which automatically signs posts.)
Secondly:What happens if you or we are from India? Yes, many of us are from the Indian subcontinent! And if you want to start a new conversation then please name it with a different heading. Welcome to Wikipedia and continue your wiki-life cheerfully! --Jagadhatri(২০১২) 08:49, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
In response to your feedback
Hi Pleasant1623, and thanks for leaving feedback. You have every right to feel proud of your edits - looking over your contribution history, I see you've done some really helpful work. Keep it up, and if you ever need a hand, feel free to drop me a line on my talkpage.
Yunshui 雲水 12:57, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
April 2012
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 06:34, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
A brownie for you!
Hi Jion! I saw you visited the Teahouse and I wanted to come by and say hi! It looks like you are doing great and feeling comfortable. If you need help with anything stop by the Teahouse and let us know, and don't forget to sign your posts :) Talk to you later! Sarah (talk) 21:17, 12 April 2012 (UTC) |
Re: help
Thank you for your asking. You can scout the internet for news articles on Kahaani as we have been doing, and add the URLs to list of URLS in the talk page. You can even try to add information from the URLs in the article appropriately, citing the sources.--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:11, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Furthering the story
Then please go ahead and start the GA nomination for Kahaani! Please do all the technical necessities appropriately.--Dwaipayan (talk) 01:47, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- The plan has been postponed, as there are more stuffs to add. Please wait.--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:06, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Message to new user
I am somewhat doubtful about your edit to User talk:Ravimy. We are clearly dealing with a user who does not understand Wikipedia standards in connection with such issues as reliable sources, but I cannot possibly see the message he posted to you as a personal attack. It is important to avoid being too discouraging to new users who may need support and advice, rather than threats and warnings. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:32, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi
Thanks for reverting vandalism on many film pages. But when you have to warn IP and (new) users do start warning them from "level 1". I have seen many of your warnings have been "only warning". Do read this for more information. Thanks. Torreslfchero (talk) 11:01, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Zeeyanketu Edit War
Fully protect the JTHJ page then. Everyone agrees that the article should remain as is and the conflicting reports section is important. But Zeeyanketu keeps on creating an edit war. He is the only one who is against it and 6 people are in favor for it. Please tell him to stop reverting the edits as he has violated the 3 RR rule many times. Ashermadan (talk) 15:57, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
- I assumed good faith but the user has launched a series of personal attacks against me. Look at the recent entry by him on the Jab Tak Hai Jaan talk page. Ashermadan (talk) 17:24, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
- Anyway,You may see how conflicting report section was added and the way it was written.---zeeyanketu talk to me 17:29, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
- The content dispute is resolved because it is a valid point and answers questions raised by many editors. Other sources have been used on pages like Bodyguard and Ra.One. Even SOS and Singham have mentioned controversies regarding their figures. It was discussed with three editors then added and many other contributors. Ashermadan (talk) 17:36, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
- You may help here Talk:Jab Tak Hai Jaan#Discussion continued---zeeyanketu talk to me 19:33, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
- Apologies.You just revert image at Dabangg 2.I know you have enough experience reagarding this and i also want to do image related work then please let it remain as it was ok.I will not revert your images too but please try to keep resolution as low as possible.Thanks!---zeeyanketu talk to me 18:47, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
billa 2 poster
this image u uploaded [1] has a website marked in it, does that count as a watermark? Kailash29792 (talk) 07:11, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- then, please delete get it deleted. remember, it is an unused non-free file (the current billa 2 poster has no watermark) ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 07:45, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks a lot. :) --smarojit (buzz me) 13:31, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
- Why do you want to move the page? --smarojit (buzz me) 05:06, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
- You have a message on my talk page. --smarojit (buzz me) 06:42, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Re: Happy New Year!
Happy New Year to you too! Thanks. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 12:45, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Budget on gatsby
Hi, you undone my edit which said the budget of Gatsby being 160-180 million before tax rebates. If you look at the article quoting the original budget, you'll see that it mentions it.
Check out Baz's Australia and you'll see that the original budget was quoted and then the eventual one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.30.71.94 (talk) 13:12, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Pleasant1623. I noticed you have been edit warring to retain your preferred version of the above image. Edit warring leads to bad feelings among editors and is considered disruptive, especially when the talk page is still a red link. You could and should discuss the proposed change on the file talk page, rather than via edit summaries. Both of you could be blocked if the current behaviour continues. -- Dianna (talk) 14:40, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Big Fish poster
Where does it say that a version of the poster with credits is preferred to one without? You haven't given me a good reason not to revert. Also, the artificial-looking colors of your latest are not correct. Film Fan (talk) 17:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- You're supposed to give valid reasons for disputed changes, and discuss them on talk pages. You're not talking. YOU are in the wrong. Film Fan (talk) 12:53, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Net not nett in AmE and BrE
Dear Pleasant,
I finally noticed the message you sent me. D'oh. It IS net in American and UK English. I am a professional editor and proofreader; I take part in an active mailing list of editors from all over the world. I consulted my colleagues and was told that nett used to be a variant spelling in the UK, but has dropped out of use there and now survives only in Indian English. This is from UK editors.
The standard for the English Wikipedia is either AmE or BrE. InE is not a standard. Insisting on a spelling that is peculiar to InE and looks wrong to the majority of WP readers is not OK. Zora (talk) 21:08, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Chopra
Thanks for the barnstar!Tibetan Prayer ᧾ 08:11, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Bodyguard soundtrack.jpeg)
Thanks for uploading File:Bodyguard soundtrack.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 07:38, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Agneepath CD.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Agneepath CD.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 07:57, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Re: July 2013
Dear Pleasant1623, Seeing the extend of plagiarism in the movie Barfi!, many Indian Media publications wrote articles about it. And even TV news channels had telecasted shows abut the plagiarism in that movie. Many bloggers had blogged about the same. So I thought there should be a "criticism(controversy)" section in the article on Wikipedia. I edited the article Barfi! and added a criticism section with the allegations, response of the director and also proper references. Then you undid my edits giving "Sorry, already mentioned" as the reason. So I gathered all the mentions of the criticism(controversy) from different sections within the article and wrote a better criticism section. I thought this will satisfy you, since you had complained that the things were being repeated. Then again you undid my edits (calling the action as a minor edit) and wrote "Since the controversy column is small, there is no need to create a separate section" as an explanation. I would like to know how big should the controversy column be so it gets its own section? Thanks --Sumitsinha lko (talk) 20:12, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
- Reply here Talk:Barfi!#Invitation for opinions for including a "Criticism/Controversy" section. --Sumitsinha lko (talk) 11:59, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
GA
Thanks, I'll review your film article probably Tuesday, I have about 4 reviews to do before then! Thanks for accepting the review, shouldn't take too long! Best.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 17:05, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jab Tak Hai Jaan
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Jab Tak Hai Jaan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 17:27, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the review! I'll review yours this evening or tomorrow!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 12:25, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Review started! Dr. Blofeld 10:32, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Chennai Express
Sorry about that - looks like we had a strange edit conflict. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 08:42, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Any Problem???
Any problem mate? Why did you revert my edit on the article Talaash: The Answer Lies Within. I reverted to the last clean version and I was just going to restore the changes made by the user Rijinatwiki. Most of all, you didn't even provide a reason regarding why you reverted my revision. The Witty Warrior (talk) 15:38, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
CE box office
If wonder if you endorse or oppose this compromise? You can comment on the talk page. Thanks for your time. Fideliosr (talk) 18:45, 12 August 2013 (UTC)