User talk:Jinxyouowemeasoda

i am wall citizin

hello

I gather you and your classmates are all editing from inside the classroom with a teacher in the room? That, in itself, is perfectly okay; see here. Most of the students in this classroom were blocked individually not for sock puppeting, but for vandalism. See the block logs here:

Foxcow is not blocked because he has apparently been making good constructive edits instead of just fooling around with talk pages and deleting large sections of content from the article pages. (I could fill a page with examples.) If you can behave good then you won't have to worry about being automatically blocked again. Again, on this page the policy about blocking multiple accounts is explained; even if you're at a school that has been blocked from editing due to vandalism, you will not necessarily be blocked if you have an account that is being used for constructive purposes and not vandalism.

Note, also, that I'm not an administrator and I wasn't involved with blocking you or anybody else, so I can't see all of the information necessary to explain what must have happened. I am just trying to help clear things up for everybody. I'm sure other people will be along shortly. An administrator will be able to help if you or another individual user wants to be unblocked. However I don't think that they will unblock everybody. Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 14:34, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Jinxyouowemeasoda. You have new messages at IRP's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- IRP ☎ 17:02, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Checkuser confirms you are Rangersarecool. Other socks you have are: Sourlemonade, Cookiecow, Shackfu. All are blocked per policy. Please appeal your block on your main account. Further socking will only lead to further measures. MBisanz ^talk 00:42, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jinxyouowemeasoda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am sourlemonade, il give you that but im not shakfu or cookiecow, foxcow is. but, sourlemonade was made for contributes, not vandalism. And ive never created vandalism with this account!

Decline reason:

It sounds like the block is perfectly appropriate then; see WP:GHBH. Mango juice^talk 15:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jinxyouowemeasoda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

whatyou showed me was that I cant have a clean account and a bad account. this account and sourlemonade never created vandalism! please, I really want to contribute, and ill try to make sure you like what I type. Im worried you will decline with the reason that I have shakfu and cookiecow, but those are foxcows, not mine, check the ip! please, I want to be a part of the largest and greatest encyclopedia and contribute to it.

Decline reason:

As stated below, we have no way of confirming that what you say is true. All we know is that there are multiple accounts coming from the same IP address, these accounts all behave in a similar manner, and that some of these accounts have been abusive. You also haven't explained why you personally were operating two accounts in the first place - this is only permitted under strict circumstances, and this doesn't seem to meet any of them. Switching IP addresses at this point doesn't prove anything, as if the accounts are in fact all yours, you'll just be careful from now on to log into one account only from home and the other only from school, etc. We've dealt with similar situations before. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 17:46, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jinxyouowemeasoda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have multiple accounts because foxcow made a account called rangerarecool1234 and said he was my account, rangersarecool. than I made darknesswolfs, and you thought it was a sock. same for shadowwolf and foxywolf. so at foxcows house I made jinxyouowemeasoda, on his laptop. I then figured out that his laptop has that same ip address. Then I created David the dogman, who was made for only contributing and pretending that we had a shared ip address. then I started acting like it was myspace and That was wrong. I really would like to have at least one account and foxcow says he wont get me blocked again.

Decline reason:

If you want a chance at being unblocked, you will have to serve a substantial block. I told Foxcow he'll have to go 3 months without any edits or any new accounts, I suppose it's fair to ask the same of you... but I can't guarantee this will work out in the end because if you both want accounts 3 months down the road it will probably be denied, because I think none of us are really willing to believe that you are two separate people. In all honesty, it might be better if you just waited a LONG time, like 3 or 4 years, until you're a bit older and more able to contribute with maturity. Mango juice^talk 19:07, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The IP has already been checked, that is what MBsianz was saying above, and has linked you to those accounts you claim aren't yours. So since you and Foxcow edit from the same IP and engage in similar behavior, we have to treat you as one person. Mango juice^talk 16:32, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wait, I'm in School right now and when I get home Ill use mt real IP address. see I created my account on foxcow's laptop and Ill prove today that its not me! or foxcows using the schools ip. Jinxyouowemeasoda (talk) 16:48, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For Wikipedia's perspective that won't prove anything. I'm sorry, it may be that your entire 4th grade class is misusing Wikipedia in an immature way and you personally are being punished for the actions of others. But since we can't ever separate between two users connecting on the same IP, we have to treat them as if they are a single person. So view it as your entire class is blocked, and we are unable to make an exception for you alone. But I'm not even sure I believe this line about school friends, because you (or several of you) did create multiple accounts, some of which were used for vandalism. Mango juice^talk 17:07, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

but what if I used my ip from my house? Jinxyouowemeasoda (talk) 17:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It does nothing to lessen the abuse. And it proves nothing too, all it proves is that you can access another IP address; for all we know maybe you're just going over to a friend's house. Mango juice^talk 17:17, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

the only friends house I go over is foxcows. Jinxyouowemeasoda (talk) 17:18, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, ill keep using my homes ip. Jinxyouowemeasoda (talk) 17:19, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

see! this is not foxcows! or the schools! this is the ip of sourlemonade! 74.233.101.92 (talk) 18:26, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]