User talk:Jing13

Hi, you have made the changes again, and still yet to explain why. IT is common to state who founded the organisation, and I don't see the rationale of removing them here. Could you explain why you insist on this edit everytime I revert it back to the original? Atticuslai 02:25, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atticuslai, do you think you are email me at peter@mark1615.info instead? thanks

Hi, you have made the changes again on Kong Hee's biography, and still yet to explain why. IT is common to speak about his family and I don't see the rationale of removing them here. Could you explain why you insist on this edit everytime I revert it back to the original? I think that you are disrespecting him and his family. I can see from above that you have a tendency of removing articles. Please refrain from defaming this man again. Macross12.

Hi, you've removed the 2 cited criticisms from City Harvest Church. However, you left the remaining uncited criticisms untouched. You did not state a reason for this action, and the citations are valid. Please edit fairly. Mark.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Kong Hee, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Mark Choo 03:41, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings for pages City Harvest Church and Sun Ho has been rescended due fair reasons being given. However, instead of just blantantly deleting edits, how about you try to improve on them instead? Mark Choo 01:02, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 02:45, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ho Yeow Sun

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ho Yeow Sun. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --Vsion 03:12, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Jing13 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.

Vsion 05:33, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

It has been established that you engaged in sockpuppetry by evidence presented here:
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Jing13, and you are therefore blocked for period of 72 hours.
You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires.

re: Ho Yeow Sun

Hi and thanks for your message. I struck out the entry for Ho Yeow Sun because I found that the copyright violations had been removed at the time I examined the article. It is never permissible to add text from a copyrighted source. Thanks --Spike Wilbury ♫ talk 04:08, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have to wait until OTRS posts a notice to the article talk page that such permission has been received. If the web site did it properly, it shouldn't take too long. Thanks for your patience! --Spike Wilbury ♫ talk 16:29, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Ho Yeow Sun. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pandacomics (talk) 22:03, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Pandacomics, I had include my reason under the edit summary. Please read again.

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ho Yeow Sun, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Pandacomics (talk) 20:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Pandcomics, I had ALWAYS included my reasons in the Edit Summary. Please read.

I had copied out from the History as below:

((cur) (last) 03:34, 12 January 2008 Jing13 (Talk | contribs) (15,369 bytes) (Please read latest post in%

February 2008

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Ho Yeow Sun, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pandacomics (talk) 23:52, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have stated the reasons for my editing for the article. Please post your reasons why the statments should be included back in.

Jing13 (talk) 04:43, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

COI Warning

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, whereby an editor forego advancing the aims of Wikipedia in order to advance outside interests, that editor stands in a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, i.e. Ho Yeow Sun, Kong Hee, City Harvest Church, City Harvest Community Services Association, acts of sockpuppetry, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

Editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
Participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
Linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam)
You must always avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, attribution, and autobiography.

Such cases may be refered to the COI Notice Board when they cause disruption to the encyclopedia as reported by any uninvolved members of WP:FACT or RC Patrollers, which may lead to accounts being blocked next and embarrassment for the individuals and groups who were being promoted. Kindly note. Thank you. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 02:15, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Ho Yeow Sun.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Ho Yeow Sun.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image with an unknown source or an unknown copyright status which has been tagged as such for more than 7 days, and it still lacks the necessary information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Ho Yeow Sun.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pandacomics (talk) 14:37, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

italicization

Song names go in quotation marks. Album names are the ones in italics. See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(music)#Popular_music Pandacomics (talk) 19:03, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]