User talk:Jimscrooge

Orphaned non-free image File:Superman Returns I M A X 3 D.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Superman Returns I M A X 3 D.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:50, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Christine Everhart 1.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Christine Everhart 1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Greb (talk) 17:28, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Christine Everhart 1.png

Thank you for uploading File:Christine Everhart 1.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:29, 12 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

And yes, a bogus source, such as the one you used, is effectively no source. - J Greb (talk) 17:28, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image use and uploads

It is considered disruptive to change images, especially infobox images, without giving a reason for the change.

It is also disruptive, at the least, to upload poor quality images just to upload them.

Lastly, looking at the proported cotentent of the image and your track record, it is evident the only reason the image would be uploaded is to add it to the unacceptable article you created, and which has been redirected, for the minor character in the film Iron Man.

Please work on constructively editing on Wikipedia. Avoid disruptive edits and apparent editis to "keep" poor or bad content. Disruptively edit again and you will be blocked.

Proposed deletion of The Dark Knight Rises (film project)

The article The Dark Knight Rises (film project) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:HAMMER

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 20:00, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Alexandra Daddario.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Alexandra Daddario.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:07, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of The Dark Knight Rises (film project)

A tag has been placed on The Dark Knight Rises (film project) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hang on}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 20:30, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Hairhorn (talk) 20:30, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Promotionaldkr.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Promotionaldkr.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Capt. Colonel (edits) 20:58, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to The Hobbit (film project), without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. There is an ongoing discussion at Talk:The Hobbit (film project)#Requested move. Thank you. --TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:10, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Our Town (film project), you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard.

Orphaned non-free image File:Avatar the complete score.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Avatar the complete score.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:43, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Going Catholic (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Going Catholic (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Going Catholic (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Closeapple (talk) 03:22, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Richard Herkimerkan

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Richard Herkimerkan, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GILO A&E⇑ 17:21, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Midget, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 17:31, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jake Dyer

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 15:08, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 15:55, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Batman Project (2012) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled Batman Project (2012). Since you had some involvement with the Untitled Batman Project (2012) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 05:44, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Venom (2012 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Venom (2012 film). Since you had some involvement with the Venom (2012 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:53, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Christine Everhart

The article Christine Everhart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Marketing campaigns aren't a measure of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 13:55, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]