User talk:Jimpearl

Jim Pearl & Crony Indian are the pseudonyms of poet Jimmy Chacko. Jim’s poems and romantic pop hits are the most valuable gift from God. Jim is the member of many International poetry societies and associations, and also secured many honors for the talents in Literature and other extra curricular activities. International cultural relationship and meeting new people are Jim’s hobbies. Jim has been writing an English novel (Named 1947) for a British Publishing House. International Library of poetry (USA) published Jim’s poems under the title of Under a Quick Silver Moon. There are a plenty of US, UK and INDIAN magazines and websites usually publishes Jim’s Poems. Dream: Gather seven different nationals; those who have similar thinking and interest poetry for a poetry collection ‘Sevens Poetry’.

Vision: Simply in Jim’s words “To contribute my ideas and dreams for the development of my society before the end of my life… …”

Family: Married. Wife: Reshmi Jimmy Childrens: Abiel & Aaron.

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Jimpearl, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Draft:Asghar Adam Ali have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:25, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jimpearl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been created about the page for Mr. Asghar Adam Ali with all the copy righted material only. If required proof of documents kindly notify the article I can get the authorisation from the concerned or Mr. Adam AliJimpearl (talk) 12:24, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.

See below. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:51, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note: This is a checkuser block, so may not be removed without the consent of a Checkuser. Your block is for sockpuppetry, not copyright. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 12:29, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Post ec comment on unblocking. So sorry. I cannot unblock you at this time. In so far as following Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials is concerned, you will not need to be unblocked for that. However, we face a graver issue. This is a check user block. Please reread the pertinent part of the WP:GAB carefully for instructions. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:52, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]